I just got a text from a local news channel here that said "Federal appeals court refuses to reconsider landmark ruling that struck down Prop 8, CA's gay marriage ban"
So what do we think that means now? People with law knowledge, help a gal out
I wonder what is going to need to happen to get the stay removed on the ruling so that gay couples can start getting married again.
I've heard the SCOTUS is prop 8's last chance, but I'm interested in what it means for the stay, since I think there's a snowballs chance in hell they ever touch this.
Yes, I registered and came out of lurkdom just to answer questions in this thread... because I am a nerd like that. ;D
This is great news! I spent all day in press conferences locally filling in the media, so thought I'd share my knowledge here since it seems like a few people are interested.
What the decision today did was reject the proponents' (pro pro 8, anti-marriage equality people) request for the 9th Circuit to re-hear the case in front of a larger panel (this is called an en banc hearing.) The 9th Circuit already ruled in our (anti-prop 8, pro-marriage equality) favor in February, saying that Prop 8 was unconstitutional so a re-hearing would have meant essentially another year of fighting it out at the 9th Circuit level. The decision today is good news for same-sex couples because a) we already won and don't need to sit around for another year just to be told that we're still right and b) it expedites the case significantly by shaving off a lot of time that could have been wasted on more appeals, which means people will hopefully be able to resume getting same-sex married sooner (not to sound overly confident; more on this below.)
An appeal to the Supreme Court is forthcoming, and will be filed in the next 90 days. The Supreme Court will either accept the case and put it on their docket for this coming term (begins October-ish) or they won't accept it and that will be the official end of Prop 8. The second scenario is more likely, as they accept like 1% of the cases appealed to them and this case is really specific to the intricacies of CA law and not super relevant to other states. Also, there isn't any controversy among the circuit courts that SCOTUS needs to step in and settle. It's textbook for the kind of case they routinely pass over.
Even if we won at the Supreme Court it wouldn't really affect any other states or be very good precedent because it's so specific to California's system that it's not likely to help the fight for marriage equality in other states.
Possible outcomes from here are the following:
SCOTUS declines the cert petition = marriage equality is re-legalized in California SCOTUS accepts the cert petition, hears the case, and decides in our favor = marriage equality is re-legalized in California SCOTUS accept the cert petition, hears the case, and decides against us = no marriage equality for California except through another ballot initiative to override Prop 8 with a constitutional amendment.
As you can see, the odds are somewhat in the pro-marriage equality camp's favor. The first scenario, which has SCOTUS declining the petition, would happen as quickly as next fall. The scenarios where they accept the case and do oral arguments (fall/winter of next year) put a decision sometime around June of next year. Either way, we are not going to have to wait very long!
I've heard the SCOTUS is prop 8's last chance, but I'm interested in what it means for the stay, since I think there's a snowballs chance in hell they ever touch this.
The stay is only in place pending further appeal of the case. The last chance for appeal is now the Supreme Court, so if they don't touch the case (I agree with you it's not likely) marriage equality will just automatically be restored to CA because the stay will be lifted. No more appeals = no more stay.
Great news! They can still appeal to the supreme court, yes?
Truthfully I haven't followed this that closely for a while. Did they work out the issue with who had standing to bring the case?
This is a great question. Technically there are two major components to the case. The first is the issue of who has standing. The second is the issue of whether Prop 8 is unconstitutional.
The debate about standing is really about whether the Yes on 8 group, the people who sponsored Prop 8, are allowed to go to court to defend the constitutionality of the law. Usually the gov and attny general do that job, but in this case they agreed that Prop 8 was unconstitutional and didn't defend it. The Yes on 8 people got permission to join the case as "defendant intervenors" and participated in the trial at the district court level with judge Walker. This became more of an issue when Prop 8 lost at that trial and neither the gov or the attny general wanted to appeal the case.
The issue there is that at the federal court level, the people who brought the case were same-sex couples who wanted to get legally married and they had standing to bring a lawsuit against Prop 8 challenging its constitutionality. During the appeals process, standing needs to be held on the part of the people challenging the lower court ruling, so the Yes on 8 people had to claim they had standing in order to appeal the lower ruling that Prop 8 was unconstitutional. The 9th Circuit found that they did have standing to appeal and then ruled on part B of the case, which is whether Prop 8 is unconstitutional.
Technically, the Supreme Court will hear both these issues as well (if they accept the case for review). If they find that the Yes on 8 people do not have standing*, they will dismiss the case without ruling on the merits (whether Prop 8 is unconstitutional.) What that means is that the 9th Circuit's ruling that they do have standing AND the 9th Circuit's decision about the merits of the case and whether Prop 8 is constitutional will both be thrown out. If you don't have standing the rulings on the merits are invalidated. In this particular case, that is great news for marriage equality because it leaves in tact the original federal district court ruling from judge Walker that struck down Prop 8 to begin with. In that scenario, marriage equality would become legal again and the Yes on 8 people wouldn't have anyone left to appeal.
*The SCOTUS loves to overturn the 9th Circuit on the standing issue, so this is a somewhat likely scenario if the case actually does go before them.
Thanks llama!!! What do you do for a living, if you don't mind me asking? You should stop lurking and start posting
No problem! I work at an LGBT-serving nonprofit in Central California managing the LGBT activism and advocacy branch of the organization. I am not a lawyer but have a pretty decent grasp on civil rights law and LGBT-related issues in particular... better than many of my lawyer friends, actually!
My wife and I are also one of the 18,000 couples who got legally married before Prop 8 passed in 2008.
Thanks llama!!! What do you do for a living, if you don't mind me asking? You should stop lurking and start posting
No problem! I work at an LGBT-serving nonprofit in Central California managing the LGBT activism and advocacy branch of the organization. I am not a lawyer but have a pretty decent grasp on civil rights law and LGBT-related issues in particular... better than many of my lawyer friends, actually!
My wife and I are also one of the 18,000 couples who got legally married before Prop 8 passed in 2008.
That is awesome! You need to post more, woman. We don't bite THAT often
I should post more. It's embarrassing how long I have been lurking. Like 3 years or something. I have posted before, mostly in threads like these, which is silly since I'm a huge politics buff. My first post ever on the board back on the nest was when Cuomo was elected gov of NY and I was like "Great, now maybe they can pass marriage equality!" and like 7 people jumped on me saying it wasn't ever going to happen. I admit I did laugh the day he signed the bill. I'll learn to bite back.
I am too! I think we have very little to gain from a Supreme Court ruling in this case. I mean, it's nice to be affirmed by them and everything (assuming it doesn't go horribly, which isn't something I'd gamble on in this current Court) but it doesn't really change the outcome much. It's not like, for example, they would legalize marriage equality in all 50 states or something. That would be WAY outside of the limits of this case as defined by the 9th Circuit, and definitely overreaching for a pretty conservative Court. Better to just leave well enough alone when we've already won. Only a few months until we'll know more about the trajectory of the case!
I don't know that this deserves another whole thread, but more good marriage equality news today out of NY. A Federal District Court judge just ruled that section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional (sound familiar?!) in a case called Windsor v. USA. This case is going to be appealed to the 2nd Circuit, meaning there will be 3 cases in 3 different appellate court districts all working their way to the Supreme Court around the same time.