I've been thinking a lot about the boy in those photos and his life, how the cycle just repeats itself. I'm wondering, what are the liberal and conservative answers to breaking this cycle and helping kids out of this?
I think I know what the liberal answer is - government programs in school and elsewhere to hopefully alleviate the kid's disabilities, food stamps and welfare for the parents so they can live somewhere that isn't filthy, access to birth control to prevent 14 year olds from getting pregnant, etc. (not making any comments on how effective or not any of these are, just discussing). But I honestly don't know what the conservative answer is for helping a child like this.
I really, really don't want this to become snarky - I am genuinely interested in what the conservative solution is for a child who has grown up with shitty/absent parents and has emotional disabilities already at the age of 6.
Anyway, the conservative is much like it, imo...wanting safety nets to be there with more defined outcomes. Education is huge, but we need overhaul and the Rs nor Ds have any idea what to do. WEll, honestly, I think education is key.
I have worked in the child abuse/neglect field for the majority of my career and don't know the answer to this. Like we saw from those photos, so much of it is generational and the state can provide service after service to help with things like budgeting, housekeeping, a daily routine, and general parenting and quite often, it doesn't make a bit of difference.
I don't think there is an easy answer. There have been some interesting programs I've heard about recently that basically make Low SES support groups and they report back to each other about choices, finances etc and they seem to work on a small scale.
Education goes a long way, but how do you keep a kid like the ones in the picture in school. I doubt the parents are going to encourage them to stay and teachers can't be social workers.
By "education", what does that mean, though? If he can do division and find the US on a map, does that really help prevent his having unprotected sex at age 13?
Anyway, the conservative is much like it, imo...wanting safety nets to be there with more defined outcomes. Education is huge, but we need overhaul and the Rs nor Ds have any idea what to do. WEll, honestly, I think education is key.
Agreed. I'd be interested to know what the mom's story is. How did the educational system fail her? And how did her family fail her.
Not to get churchy on you, but this was part of the message my pastor delivered. Strongholds. The things we deal with have a generational impact. Your children pick up what issues you have and we constantly pass them down. At some point, we as family members, communities have to do more to show that there is another way out.
*sigh* I don't know. And honestly, it's not just Personal Responsibility or Social Programs. It's going to take a little bit of everything to make a difference. And I hate to even say it, but there is also a point when we need to realize we can't save everyone. That kid could have been helped tremendously by a neighborhood after school program of Big Brothers Big Sisters. But, his mom has to sign him up. And if she doesn't know or care enough, well what can you do.
The parents desperately need jobs and education and parent education and mentors. They have no guidance at all, how are they going to raise children? The kid needs some sort of security and stability. Everything in his life seems so transient and haphazard. His whole life is just thrown together. Whatever casework there is, it needs to be streamlined under one umbrella, with minimal workers who aren't always leaving because their own pay and hours are shitty. These do not seem to be young people who are going to have the ability to go to several different offices and places for services that aren't coordinated anyways.
In a perfect world, obviously his mom would try to get a job and give him some stability. But, she isn't. She's a shitty mother. And he's going to grow up to be a shitty father if nobody intervenes. So now what? Is there any hope for people like this or do you just say, well, some people are just going to be like this and there's nothing we can do?
Short of taking away all the babies born to 14 year old mothers, I just don't know what can be done.
By "education", what does that mean, though? If he can do division and find the US on a map, does that really help prevent his having unprotected sex at age 13?
in my world education includes how to prevent babies :-)
but I think if one member of this family had completed high school and maybe even an AA life would be a lot different for them.
change has to be possible. I have relatives that are probably 2 scale above the pictures on a 10 points scale and I'd like to think I'm doing okay despite probably growing up in a 5/6 point home.
By "education", what does that mean, though? If he can do division and find the US on a map, does that really help prevent his having unprotected sex at age 13?
in my world education includes how to prevent babies :-)
but I think if one member of this family had completed high school and maybe even an AA life would be a lot different for them.
change has to be possible. I have relatives that are probably 2 scale above the pictures on a 10 points scale and I'd like to think I'm doing okay despite probably growing up in a 5/6 point home.
Yeah but while you can teach people *how* to prevent babies you can't really teach them to *want* to prevent babies.
I don't know. I'm feeling particularly depressed about things today.
By "education", what does that mean, though? If he can do division and find the US on a map, does that really help prevent his having unprotected sex at age 13?
Education, to me, involves a strong parent/caregiver involvement piece, much like you see in Title I. I think taht should expand out. I also think we should fund more areas like 21st Century Learning Communities for afterschool programs to continue the normal school day. Also, areas like health education, diet, fitness, etc.
Hell TTT - I know 40 yr old mothers that need their kids taken away. I would curl up and cry if T told me she was having sex at 14. At 14, I was still jumping out of trees and racing my bike around the neighborhood.
By "education", what does that mean, though? If he can do division and find the US on a map, does that really help prevent his having unprotected sex at age 13?
in my world education includes how to prevent babies :-)
but I think if one member of this family had completed high school and maybe even an AA life would be a lot different for them.
change has to be possible. I have relatives that are probably 2 scale above the pictures on a 10 points scale and I'd like to think I'm doing okay despite probably growing up in a 5/6 point home.
we have more in common than you know.
Teachers don't need to be social workers. They need to be allowed to teach sex education and health to kids.
Yeah but while you can teach people *how* to prevent babies you can't really teach them to *want* to prevent babies.
I don't know. I'm feeling particularly depressed about things today.
That's frequently the crux of the issue. It's almost a cultural divide, and those who think that they should want to prevent pregnancies don't understand why they wouldn't enough to even begin to solve the problem, and those who do understand don't get why everyone else thinks the pregnancies should be prevented.
In a perfect world, obviously his mom would try to get a job and give him some stability. But, she isn't. She's a shitty mother. And he's going to grow up to be a shitty father if nobody intervenes. So now what? Is there any hope for people like this or do you just say, well, some people are just going to be like this and there's nothing we can do?
Short of taking away all the babies born to 14 year old mothers, I just don't know what can be done.
One photo mentioned that she went to an alternative high school for teen parents. Wouldn't that type of school teach you things like, well, parenting? In addition to life and career skills? I would hope, because god knows a 14 year old mother probably needs those types of classes.
I think sometimes it can hinge on there being one or even two people who can enter a person's life, like this boy's, and take enough of a healthy interest in him to make him realize the cycle can be busted - with a combination of effort and assistance. But I imagine the odds of that are infinitesimally small when you have a limited scope of acquaintances and environments, precluding you from ever meeting someone like that who could provide that alternate perspective and influence.
I do think local and community resources and programs can help - and yes, even faith-based ones. Lots of churches offer assistance with no strings attached - you don't have to commit your life to Jesus or even attend a service to get food or receive some human support. But frankly I think even the church congregants fall far short of doing this kind of outreach when the need is obviously there. (Now I'm feeling convicted for not taking my own steps to effect some change in someone's life near me - it's what I hear about at church every Sunday.)
But again, I think it comes down to a light going off in this kid's mind that things CAN be different - and then if he is encouraged to take steps toward that light or not.
So... I guess I"m staying, very tritely, it starts with me.
ETA: The above person-to-person influence applies to anyone in this situation - didn't mean to relegate it strictly to the child. Adults can use that kind of intervention as well.
Post by Beeps (WOT?*) on Aug 13, 2012 15:24:54 GMT -5
My old Home Ec teacher had a "Life Prep" class that taught basic life skills like budgeting, cooking, basic sewing, etc. One of the sets she taught included birth control. She flat out told us "don't tell what I'm teaching because I'm only supposed to teach *this part* of the program. I don't believe that teaching one part without teaching the others will help you learn anything." So she taught us about the various birth control methods and abortion as well. This was back in the early 1980s and I wish every teacher had her courage and wisdom. And more parents did too.
I'm another "groups and organizations" advocate. My grands are under the supervision of CPS and I welcome their advocacy because my daughter refuses to listen to me because "I'm that bitch that stole her daughter and made her life hell" rather than "the person worried about the teenager who can't take care of herself let alone a child and trying to even out the equation and get everyone on a solid footing." CPS has been a godsend, as has the GAL. Big Brothers/Big Sisters helped coordinate a weeklong camp with the Salvation Army for lower income kids for a week in the mountains at a minimal fee (which I paid). The schools and GD2s doctors have been instrumental in keeping the girls properly supervised and healthy. I've been able to get them counseling through Catholic Charities, though other options were also provided. The state has provided health insurance to make certain the medical issues were taken care of... There has been a blanket of civil, medical, personal and religious individuals and groupos protecting these two children, mostly because people around my daughter have been making sure they were protected. Otherwise, I fear that their lives would been eerily close to that poor boy's because of her life choices.
But again, I think it comes down to a light going off in this kid's mind that things CAN be different - and then if he is encouraged to take steps toward that light or not.
So... I guess I'm staying, very tritely, it starts with me.
and everything else druidp said in some way, shape or form.
Short of taking away all the babies born to 14 year old mothers, I just don't know what can be done.
Well, I mean falling short of this (which, if I am being perfectly honest, I am not sure I disagree with it 100%), what sort of programs are in place? This is very big brother of me, but I'd be in favor of some sort of government-sponsored monitoring program. I have no idea on implementation and I hate to equate it to negative programs like parole or the sex-offender registry, but yea. Something where there is someone, anyone, checking up on these kids (kids = both the babies and the teen parents) once they leave the hospital.
I don't know. Is there ever a answer? Maybe put the kids in some type of program that addresses their needs, emotionally, socially, and educationally. Childcare for when the parents are working. Put the parents in programs that teach job skills and helps get them a stable full-time job, drug and alcohol intervention, parenting, home skills, and the like. And, have a mentor to keep them on track for a few years to help them get it together. Is that all possible? Would it work? Who knows.
My old Home Ec teacher had a "Life Prep" class that taught basic life skills like budgeting, cooking, basic sewing, etc. One of the sets she taught included birth control. She flat out told us "don't tell what I'm teaching because I'm only supposed to teach *this part* of the program. I don't believe that teaching one part without teaching the others will help you learn anything." So she taught us about the various birth control methods and abortion as well. This was back in the early 1980s and I wish every teacher had her courage and wisdom. And more parents did too.
Tennessee would see this teacher promptly fired. And that's a dayum shame. Seriously.
In a perfect world, obviously his mom would try to get a job and give him some stability. But, she isn't. She's a shitty mother. And he's going to grow up to be a shitty father if nobody intervenes. So now what? Is there any hope for people like this or do you just say, well, some people are just going to be like this and there's nothing we can do?
Short of taking away all the babies born to 14 year old mothers, I just don't know what can be done.
One photo mentioned that she went to an alternative high school for teen parents. Wouldn't that type of school teach you things like, well, parenting? In addition to life and career skills? I would hope, because god knows a 14 year old mother probably needs those types of classes.
Clearly if they did teach them, they didn't get through to this mother.
Which is part of the problem too. You can teach as much as you want, but if people don't want to learn or listen to what you're teaching, it's pointless. You can tell her all day not to give her 2 year old Mountain Dew for breakfast, but if she doesn't care, what difference does it make?
major: I didn't realize they had jobs. What do they do? I guess it doesn't really matter - this doesn't seem to be about money nearly as much as it is about culture. These people probably see absolutely nothing wrong with the way they live, so why change it?
The churches in my mom's area help members first, and by then most of their resources, whether human or financial, are tapped out by the time someone off the street comes in.
I don't know. I'm feeling particularly depressed about things today.
I'm right here with you. I'm so far down that I think someone who becomes a mother at 14 (likely having had sex at 13 or earlier) is already too late to win back. I think it's likely too late for Donny already. Suspension in kindergarten was already a failure to that kid.
I don't know the solution. I know that I think it's the government's role, not private or religious charities. But I just don't know how to address it.
I'm a big liberal who's worked in child welfare for 20 years, and all my con friends loved all the programs I've worked in. They were all funded by the government (by grants) but run by religious or non-profit outfits. Until they were all cut.
So, I've never understood the the put down of "government programs". The welfare office is the most g/d awful place on the planet, so that's a terrible "government" program, but ALL of the home-based services this child would get would be the places I worked. Well, he would have got (before the cuts).
So, 'big picture' all my con friends hate big government programs, but when I actually explained how it worked and what we did and the outcomes we had to prove and reach on so little money with lots of fundraising, they all were like "Oh yeah, that's great. I mean all the OTHER waste. Not your thing. That sounds great."
One photo mentioned that she went to an alternative high school for teen parents. Wouldn't that type of school teach you things like, well, parenting? In addition to life and career skills? I would hope, because god knows a 14 year old mother probably needs those types of classes.
Clearly if they did teach them, they didn't get through to this mother.
Which is part of the problem too. You can teach as much as you want, but if people don't want to learn or listen to what you're teaching, it's pointless. You can tell her all day not to give her 2 year old Mountain Dew for breakfast, but if she doesn't care, what difference does it make?
major: I didn't realize they had jobs. What do they do? I guess it doesn't really matter - this doesn't seem to be about money nearly as much as it is about culture. These people probably see absolutely nothing wrong with the way they live, so why change it?
When I used to work in teen programs, one of the worst aspects is that the facilitators would talk at the kids, not with them. So they would say, don't give your kids soda, but wouldn't say why. And that's the part that makes the lightbulb go off. The thousands of reasons why and educating what happens to the body and brain of a child when they drink that. We had a facilitator that finally did that and the teens were like, "ooohhh!" and you'd hear them telling their friends about what they learned.
I don't know. Is there ever a answer? Maybe put the kids in some type of program that addresses their needs, emotionally, socially, and educationally. Childcare for when the parents are working. Put the parents in programs that teach job skills and helps get them a stable full-time job, drug and alcohol intervention, parenting, home skills, and the like. And, have a mentor to keep them on track for a few years to help them get it together. Is that all possible? Would it work? Who knows.
Yes, you just described Even Start. Congress cut it from the budget last year in all 50 states.
I'm a big liberal who's worked in child welfare for 20 years, and all my con friends loved all the programs I've worked in. They were all funded by the government (by grants) but run by religious or non-profit outfits. Until they were all cut.
So, I've never understood the the put down of "government programs". The welfare office is the most g/d awful place on the planet, so that's a terrible "government" program, but ALL of the home-based services this child would get would be the places I worked. Well, he would have got (before the cuts).
So, 'big picture' all my con friends hate big government programs, but when I actually explained how it worked and what we did and the outcomes we had to prove and reach on so little money with lots of fundraising, they all were like "Oh yeah, that's great. I mean all the OTHER waste. Not your thing. That sounds great."
And you can get rid of waste without getting rid of the entire program and not replacing it with ANYTHING.
The military is full of waste, but you don't see it going anywhere anytime soon. Nor should it. We need it. Just get rid of the waste and improve how it all works