No such thing as cheap Champagne, but there is cheap sparkling wine. Champagne is very strictly regulated and is of high quality, though taste can vary. #winsnob
Would agree though with Champagne, I would vote for Pol Roger, Veuve Fourny, or Veuve Clicquot.
I would say pina coladas, but the calories kill me. Better if I stick with beer.
If we could do this in a hypothetical world where calories didn't exist, caffeine didn't keep you up all night, and all alcohols caused the same amount of hungoverness, I'd have a different answer too.
No such thing as cheap Champagne, but there is cheap sparkling wine. Champagne is very strictly regulated and is of high quality, though taste can vary. #winsnob
Would agree though with Champagne, I would vote for Pol Roger, Veuve Fourny, or Veuve Clicquot.
This not exactly true. It's regulated in France. There are no US regulations on the use of the term, however. American producers can call their sparkling wine whatever the hell they want. In general, no respectable sparkling producer in the US, like Mumm or Roederer, would call their stuff "champagne." But, low-end sparkling wine producers do. Have you ever seen a Korbel label? It says right on there "California Champagne." And Korbel is fucking nasty.
Anyway, if I could have one drink for the rest of my life if would be probably be a dry rose. Seems like the most versatile choice.