Were he quite the little shit you think he must be, he'd have tralalala'd his way to college with the scholarship money in hand, don't you think? Are you assuming that only the peer pressure and "public shame" as he received the award are what prompted him to return the money?
Yes, I do. I think he 1) was shocked that people were laughing, and 2) embarrassed that it went as far as it did. If he really did think that he should have the scholarship, he wouldn't have returned it.
I do think he has a conscious that eventually steered him in the right direction.
Thank you for adding to the argument! ;D Personal attacks add SO MUCH to a thread.
Well, at least you weren't called fucking predictable and banal. (that wasn't from you) But that's hardly an attack in comparison to other shiz that has flown around on here.
Thank you for adding to the argument! ;D Personal attacks add SO MUCH to a thread.
Well, at least you weren't called fucking predictable and banal. (that wasn't from you) But that's hardly an attack in comparison to other shiz that has flown around on here.
I know. I'm pretty well finished with personal attacks in the form of "debate" at the moment, though.
Were he quite the little shit you think he must be, he'd have tralalala'd his way to college with the scholarship money in hand, don't you think? Are you assuming that only the peer pressure and "public shame" as he received the award are what prompted him to return the money?
Yes, I do. I think he 1) was shocked that people were laughing, and 2) embarrassed that it went as far as it did. If he really did think that he should have the scholarship, he wouldn't have returned it.
I do think he has a conscious that eventually steered him in the right direction.
As far as I can tell, you are judging/assuming the worst of this kid....based on....what?
Post by MixedBerryJam on Jun 12, 2012 15:41:05 GMT -5
Actually, I give the kid kudos for applying for all the scholarships that he may have qualified for. That is the opposite of "entitlement." My kid might have applied for one, and then gone back to his video games. It sounds like this kid took the process seriously, and I have a lot of respect for that. I do not interpret "minority students encouraged to apply" as an invitation for white kids not to, and I didn't see anythink in the article that referenced the family's socioeconomic conditions, so I don't get the whole "he's taking advantage" argument, either.
As far as I can tell, you are judging/assuming the worst of this kid....based on....what?
Personal experience of high school kids? There are several points in this story that don't read true to me that this kid was completely innocent in all this.
On the flip side, why are you assuming the best of him? There really isn't much to go on in this story. We're just doing what this board does best, leaping to conclusions based upon a limited source and then defending our positions to the death.
Side eyeing someone is a personal attack now? When did we get that uppity?
(white folks, I mean. Obviously, you can't call black folks uppity. Half black folks, maybe. I need to consult my race relations handbook . . . once I finish perusing the chapter on applications.)
Post by wrathofkuus on Jun 12, 2012 15:41:45 GMT -5
Sure, he wondered. But what if he was mistaken, since it was apparently vague, and it turned out that it could just as easily be awarded to a white boy? Wouldn't he have regretted not even bothering to apply?
You really seem to want to think the worst of this kid, to the point of implicitly suggesting that white people should steer clear of scholarship applications if they even think that possibly maybe it should go to a black person instead. Why is this? Especially with the high cost of tuition and the fact that kids are encouraged to apply for any aid they might possibly qualify for just in case?
I'm just looking at him as a kid who applied for whatever scholarship he was eligible for.
Although, when I was applying for scholarships, I did shy away from ones that encouraged people of a particular background/skill/athletic prowess/etc. that I didn't have to apply. Why waste my time since I would've read that as me having little to no chance of winning?
This reminds me of DH's niece's graduation, where one graduate had their list of scholarships & grants read off... and it took a full four minutes. Kid had applied for and received at least 15 different amounts of money from separate entities, and bang - first year of college paid for. I remember thinking I'm going to be that neurotic and annoying mom who makes my son/daughter apply for everything out there.
As far as I can tell, you are judging/assuming the worst of this kid....based on....what?
Personal experience of high school kids? There are several points in this story that don't read true to me that this kid was completely innocent in all this.
On the flip side, why are you assuming the best of him? There really isn't much to go on in this story. We're just doing what this board does best, leaping to conclusions based upon a limited source and then defending our positions to the death.
Hey, I have personal experiences with students too. However, it seems to me that there is NOTHING in this article to assume that he is one of *those* students. That's why I choose to assume the best until I receive further facts. It does state that he received 4 other scholarships. Based on that fact alone, I'm thinking he's more likely a good student, not a little shits
ETA: WRT the "several points" that don't ring true for you, could you elaborate?
Hang on, I'm searching for other articles for more information other than just this one.
There are several out there that are spinning this in that the MLK scholarship committee yanked the scholarship back from him. THOSE articles I'm also side-eying (yes, those are racist assholes).
Would there be a difference if it was someone who was Indian or Asian that won?
For me? That gets more convoluted because there isn't the clear white/black racial tension that has been around for centuries, kwim? I don't think I would have had as much of a problem. Which shows my inherit prejudice, I guess.
habs, you're just haughty, a half step from uppity
And, yeah, side-eye is not a personal attack.
But how does it add to a discussion thread? It doesn't. It's a statement about the person and not about the issue stated. There's no argument there other than, "You're crazy (implied)."
ZOMG, you guys, can't you tell I'm jonesing for an intelligent debate that doesn't spiral into hair pulling personal attacks? We haven't had one of those in ages.
Last Edit: Jun 12, 2012 15:56:56 GMT -5 by pedanticwench
I have all the books I could need, and what more could I need than books? I shall only engage in commerce if books are the coin. -- Catherynne M. Valente
Post by wrathofkuus on Jun 12, 2012 15:57:13 GMT -5
I think that the question of mental development and how it plays into being able to fully grasp -isms that aren't putting you at the disadvantage is an interesting one.
I have all the books I could need, and what more could I need than books? I shall only engage in commerce if books are the coin. -- Catherynne M. Valente
share.memebox.com/x/uKhKaZmemebox referal code for 20% off! DD1 "J" born 3/2003 DD2 "G" born 4/2011 DS is here! "H" born 2/2014 m/c#3 1-13-13 @ 9 weeks m/c#2 11-11-12 @ 5w2d I am an extended breastfeeding, cloth diapering, baby wearing, pro marriage equality, birth control lovin', Catholic mama.
habs, you're just haughty, a half step from uppity
And, yeah, side-eye is not a personal attack.
But how does it add to a discussion thread? It doesn't. It's a statement about the person and not about the issue stated. There's no argument there other than, "You're crazy (implied)."
ZOMG, you guys, can't you tell I'm jonesing for an intelligent debate that doesn't spiral into hair pulling personal attacks? We haven't had one of those in ages.
Pixy, I don't usually get into these things, but it bothers me for some reason that you are nailing this kid without a shred of evidence. Didn't you start this thread by side-eyeing him...hard? Was that a personal attack too?