I am surprised facebook didn't remove it. Someone I know did this recently and then came on FB days later saying FB deactivated her account until she would delete it (it was a pic of her daughters bum from behind).
A friend had 3 year old penis on her wall and someone commented "this photo needs a blur spot". It's still up there for all to see. Doesn't surprise me since she frequently posts picture of him with his hand down the front of his pants. :/
I wouldn't message, because I'm not a mom, so my thoughts aren't deemed eligible. But I will never understand why people knowingly put this stuff on Facebook. The photos don't bother me. But those are for home photo albums, not Facebook with your kids name. I would not be happy if I were 13 and found out the Internet had copies of my naked baby photos.
I wouldn't message, because I'm not a mom, so my thoughts aren't deemed eligible. But I will never understand why people knowingly put this stuff on Facebook. The photos don't bother me. But those are for home photo albums, not Facebook with your kids name. I would not be happy if I were 13 and found out the Internet had copies of my naked baby photos.
Not sure that would be my first concern.
There are a shitload of weirdos out there. I'd be far more concerned about them getting to it before FB had the chance to remove it.
I wouldn't message, because I'm not a mom, so my thoughts aren't deemed eligible. But I will never understand why people knowingly put this stuff on Facebook. The photos don't bother me. But those are for home photo albums, not Facebook with your kids name. I would not be happy if I were 13 and found out the Internet had copies of my naked baby photos.
Not sure that would be my first concern.
There are a shitload of weirdos out there. I'd be far more concerned about them getting to it before FB had the chance to remove it.
How could you possibly miss that?
Because there are photos of naked babies everywhere, and if it's a baby, I'm assuming a parent or guardian will be around all the time. If the kid were three or four, I would be more concerned about weirdos.
I have a friend who posted a bunch of pics from her daughter's birthday morning where she is opening gifts. Daughter is wearing nightgown and no undies and is resting on her feet and you can see everything. There are at least two shots like this. She also has one of her son being held by another lady penis all out in the open. There are also other people (givers of the gifts) tagged so a lot of people probably have access. She's from the U.K. and I'm not sure if the feeling about this is different there, but it makes me uncomfortable and I don't know what to say either, it's pretty obvious in all the pics and I think she just doesn't care.
There are a shitload of weirdos out there. I'd be far more concerned about them getting to it before FB had the chance to remove it.
How could you possibly miss that?
Because there are photos of naked babies everywhere, and if it's a baby, I'm assuming a parent or guardian will be around all the time. If the kid were three or four, I would be more concerned about weirdos.
Uh...you do know children of all ages often have their photos collected by pervs who want kiddie porn, right? Just because there are naked baby photos else where, doesn't mean you should go plastering your child's privates on the internet. And what does a parent being around have to do with it? If the parent leaves the photo up, that photo can be taken by anyone who feels like saving it. Weirdos prey on infants, toddlers, pre-teens, teens, young adults, adults, etc.
I don't know. I'm not a parent, I never will be, so it's not a decision I'll ever have to make. I don't get why people put the photos up, but I kinda assumed it was a parenting decision that is probably none of my business.
Yeah, that's gross. I don't get it. My SIL's mother had posted a pic of my niece and her cousin in the tub together as her profile pic. Ya know, a picture that is viewable to the full public with two naked girls in it. Ick.
Because there are photos of naked babies everywhere, and if it's a baby, I'm assuming a parent or guardian will be around all the time. If the kid were three or four, I would be more concerned about weirdos.
Uh...you do know children of all ages often have their photos collected by pervs who want kiddie porn, right? Just because there are naked baby photos else where, doesn't mean you should go plastering your child's privates on the internet. And what does a parent being around have to do with it? If the parent leaves the photo up, that photo can be taken by anyone who feels like saving it. Weirdos prey on infants, toddlers, pre-teens, teens, young adults, adults, etc.
^What she said.
I wasn't saying that my concern was that the child would somehow be physically tracked down by some weirdo with horrible intentions...my concern is that the picture could be circling around as child pornography as we speak. That's a real possibility, and because the internet is so vast, once its done, it would be quite difficult to wipe the photo from existence, even if the child has a posse the size of King Leonidus' army. Get what I'm saying?
WTMF? That disgusting shit calls for a call-out if it's an AE.
Yah really. If she is an AE, I'd really prefer to know what poster it is. SO many people post, normal, photos of their kids here. And that line of thinking, even to be a bitch, is just so disgusting.