S/O celebrity nude pics and tmz

[gretchenindisguise]

I'm on my phone so no poll, but if you had nude pics if a celeb would you sell for $1million to tmz?

Same decision for you as healthcare question?

Herder or easier to make the decision?

[CheshireGrin]

I think it's slightly different in the sense that there is no overt breach of responsibility. Everyone with access to healthcare information agrees to an explicit contract not to share it. Depending on how said nude photos were obtained, that contract might be implied, but not necessarily explicit.

That being said, it's still an easy answer for me, because I remember when I got divorced, there were, uh, certain photos that I neglected to get back from my XH. It seriously tortured me for YEARS wondering if he had destroyed them like a gentleman or if they were going to show up somewhere compromising. I would never be able to commit such a violation of trust, certainly not for monetary gain. I still have to be able to live with myself.

[AmeliaBedelia]

No. That's such a gross violation of privacy.

[hisno1girl]

No. To me, this seems worse than sharing medical information.

[suzyp]

Sept 1, 2014 7:22:13 GMT -5 hisno1girl said:

No. To me, this seems worse than sharing medical information.

I agree. I won't look at the leaked photos for this reason. It's such a violation

[verycontrary247]

Sept 1, 2014 8:24:50 GMT -5 nicbreeful said:

No.

I actually have some semi-nudes of a male celebrity. Though he's more B/C List than anything. A girlfriend of mine and him had been talking (he was still just on a TV show, hadn't done any movies at this point). He sent her underwear shots of himself. He was clearly very.. happy.. in the photos. She sent them on to me. I still have them saved on my old comp, lol. And no, even if he did become a big star, I don't think I would sell them.

You could tell us more about him! And the movies he's been in.

[wannabe]

yeah, no. i also refuse to even look at the leaked photos - that's so not cool, the subjects didn't give permission to have these shown anywhere. it's not like taking random pics of celebs when they're out and about, this is just a horrible invasion of privacy.

[marylennox]

No way. Wtf.

[gretchenindisguise]

Sept 1, 2014 9:30:46 GMT -5 toledo said:

I can't even with CEP on this. Already with the "you're a celebrity! What did you expect? No nudie privacy for you!" Pffffftttttt......

It's so against their norm too. It's like celebrity women aren't really women in their eyes.

[Jalapeñomel]

These pics were also obtained illegally, right?

Fuck that person.

[rosiebear]

Sept 1, 2014 9:40:31 GMT -5 tators said:

Rosie feels strongly on this topic lol.

I would rather have my med records leaked.

Both suck though.

OMG. I have no idea how that happened, lol. I'm trying to clean it up, with limited success. My apologies!

[hisno1girl]

God is testing me.

I. just found out that Kate Upton's cell phone also got hacked and there are alleged nude photos of her and her boyfriend, J ustin Verlander.

Justin Verlander of the Detroit Tigers. A man I have lusted over for YEARS.  

I want to look at the pictures soooooo bad!!!!!!!

I must resist. I. must resist.

Its been like eleven minutes since I found out and I have not Googled.

This is so hard!!!!!!

[gretchenindisguise]

Sept 1, 2014 9:41:55 GMT -5 Jalapeñomel said:

These pics were also obtained illegally, right?

Fuck that person.

Yes. Via iCloud. Shockingly no male celebs had their nudie or underwear pics leaked.

[gretchenindisguise]

Sept 1, 2014 9:41:55 GMT -5 Jalapeñomel said:

These pics were also obtained illegally, right?

Fuck that person.

Yes. Via iCloud. Shockingly no male celebs had their nudie or underwear pics leaked.

[LLL]

Umm Wtf Proboards?!

[Eagles]

No, not a chance. It's such a violation. I will say (and I'm not in any way victim blaming) that I wouldn't backup pictures like that to a cloud server, not even just as regular person me. I don't have an iPhone and I back up my phone pics to Dropbox, but only family-friendly ones, because I would be mortified if somehow a boob shot that I sent H showed up out in the world. That being said, those pictures are stolen private property and I hope they find the assbags who hacked them.

[gretchenindisguise]

Sept 1, 2014 9:57:53 GMT -5 Eagles said:

No, not a chance. It's such a violation. I will say (and I'm not in any way victim blaming) that I wouldn't backup pictures like that to a cloud server, not even just as regular person me. I don't have an iPhone and I back up my phone pics to Dropbox, but only family-friendly ones, because I would be mortified if somehow a boob shot that I sent H showed up out in the world. That being said, those pictures are stolen private property and I hope they find the assbags who hacked them.

iPhone does it automatically and it's kind of a bitch to stop.

[Eagles]

Sept 1, 2014 9:59:12 GMT -5 gretchenindisguise said:

Sept 1, 2014 9:57:53 GMT -5 Eagles said:

No, not a chance. It's such a violation. I will say (and I'm not in any way victim blaming) that I wouldn't backup pictures like that to a cloud server, not even just as regular person me. I don't have an iPhone and I back up my phone pics to Dropbox, but only family-friendly ones, because I would be mortified if somehow a boob shot that I sent H showed up out in the world. That being said, those pictures are stolen private property and I hope they find the assbags who hacked them.

iPhone does it automatically and it's kind of a bitch to stop.

I wondered about that.  Like I said, I have no iPhone experience so I admit that I'm probably talking out my ass.  To me, this is the same as someone breaking into your home and stealing photos. 

[Eagles]

WE WEREN'T THE ONES WHO STOLE THE PICTURES, NSA.

[LLL]

I would allow myself to be painted like a french girl (Rose and Jack style). If that were to leak it would be slightly above the Screech sex tape in desirability

[gretchenindisguise]

Sept 1, 2014 10:01:45 GMT -5 toledo said:

OK. I AM a little weirded out that this is the ONLY thread this is happening to.

NSA JOKE NOT SO FUNNY NOW.

I was having issues with all the thread on the app, not just this one.  Not sure if that makes you feel better or worse. 

[Deleted]

Sept 1, 2014 1:28:02 GMT -5 CheshireGrin said:

I think it's slightly different in the sense that there is no overt breach of responsibility. Everyone with access to healthcare information agrees to an explicit contract not to share it. Depending on how said nude photos were obtained, that contract might be implied, but not necessarily explicit.

I understand your point here, but I think it's a line that wouldn't be drawn in reality. Someone who saw no problem selling nude pics of someone else for their own profit would likely not even hesitate to share medical information for profit no matter what kind of agreement they'd signed.

[jigsy]

No. I feel really bad for the people with the leaked photos.

I was listening to Rob Lowe's audiobook a year or so ago. (So dreamy). He talks a bit about his sex tape that got leaked, and I was curious and googled it. After about 2 minutes I felt so so guilty for having watched it.
Sorry Ron Lowe.

[joshlyman]

No. To both. I would rather be poor than feel like a shitty person for the rest of my life.

[underwaterrhymes]

My answer to both is no.

[kirra]

No, but the idea doesn't bother me nearly as much as the idea of selling health information.

[joshlyman]

Sept 1, 2014 11:47:06 GMT -5 nicbreeful said:

Sept 1, 2014 11:39:35 GMT -5 joshlyman said:

No. To both. I would rather be poor than feel like a shitty person for the rest of my life.

True. But at least then you could feel shitty in style.

True. I'd be the queen of shittyness.

[flamingeaux]

I don't think I would do that to someone.

[CheshireGrin]

Sept 1, 2014 10:10:31 GMT -5 @schmancy said:

Sept 1, 2014 1:28:02 GMT -5 CheshireGrin said:

I think it's slightly different in the sense that there is no overt breach of responsibility. Everyone with access to healthcare information agrees to an explicit contract not to share it. Depending on how said nude photos were obtained, that contract might be implied, but not necessarily explicit.

I understand your point here, but I think it's a line that wouldn't be drawn in reality. Someone who saw no problem selling nude pics of someone else for their own profit would likely not even hesitate to share medical information for profit no matter what kind of agreement they'd signed.

I agree that it's really a philosophical difference. In the real world both are equally heinous. But for the purposes of the original question, there seems to be a difference between someone who would recognize a duty and then breach it for their own gain, and someone who was simply out for their own gain to begin with. Not a value judgment, but a difference.