1. I kinda love it 2. The Brad and Angie hate after all this time, when it's perfectly obvious that all parties involved are clearly over it is hilarious 3. Still holding out for a JT, Britney reunion 4. J/k
Post by tacoflavoredkisses on Sept 1, 2014 19:53:36 GMT -5
I like that she at least did something more traditional. But I feel like she could have had a gorgeous gown. I suspect the kids picked it out.
The veil. I want to like it because it's sort of neat and the kids drawings are sweet. But it's sort of over the top. We get it. Your kids are awesome and you love them.
I don't like it. I don't get the over infatuation with them constantly driving home the "we love our kids" point. We get it. Most of really do love our kids too. Doesn't mean I want their doodles on my gown. It's just so over the top
ETA I just read the other responses. I see this has been covered. LOL
We get it. Your kids are awesome and you love them.
LOL! Â I mean, ENOUGH ALREADY with this mother crap.
LOL that totally didn't come out how I meant. I just think the kids are kind of out there too much- they're just kids, you know? They didn't get to pick to be "famous." I always just feel bad for celebrity kids.
I love it! It is so, anti-Hollywood, and seems to keep with their tradition of being family oriented and keeping a low profile, well as low as two celebs can get. I don't get the outrage. It was a wedding for their family and children; the dresses symbolizes this. Shrugs.
LOL! Â I mean, ENOUGH ALREADY with this mother crap.
LOL that totally didn't come out how I meant. I just think the kids are kind of out there too much- they're just kids, you know? They didn't get to pick to be "famous." I always just feel bad for celebrity kids.
They've actually done a super job of keeping their kids out of the limelight.
I love it! It is so, anti-Hollywood, and seems to keep with their tradition of being family oriented and keeping a low profile, well as low as two celebs can get. I don't get the outrage. It was a wedding for their family and children; the dresses symbolizes this. Shrugs.
Yes, their wedding was so anti Hollywood that they sold the photos to People! Way to stick it to them, Brangelina!!!
Post by sapphireblue on Sept 1, 2014 20:08:08 GMT -5
Well, she always looks beautiful and she does in her wedding dress. I don't love it but who cares?
I think the veil with the kids' drawings is very very cool. I love the idea of the dress with the drawings too but probably would have limited them to the veil.
But, she has always done her own thing and I say good for her!
This thread is cracking me up because Angelina gets to wear gowns all.the.time. Always. And she's been famous enough long enough that these aren't off the rack or even off the runway creations she has tailored at her local strip mall. They're custom designed. ALWAYS.
So not only is wearing "a gown" not a big deal to her, but wearing a gown specially designed FOR her isn't a big deal to her. So, this time, she got to be all fuck all y'all, I'm going to do what I want.
I love it! It is so, anti-Hollywood, and seems to keep with their tradition of being family oriented and keeping a low profile, well as low as two celebs can get. I don't get the outrage. It was a wedding for their family and children; the dresses symbolizes this. Shrugs.
Yes, their wedding was so anti Hollywood that they sold the photos to People! Way to stick it to them, Brangelina!!!
Oh yes. Because after 10 years of media/the world overinvestment in their relationship (I note this is twice as long as the duration of his marriage to Jennifer Anniston), they were totes going to be able to demur forever and not share them and not have to worry that they'd be hounded for them, relentlessly.
ETA: Aniston? Anniston? Both look wrong. As does 75% of her shoe collection. Ba-DUM-che! I'll be here all week, folks.