Bragplaint I was approaching highly compensated and it was pissing me off. This is amazing news.
Well, you may have the problem in the future, they rarely increase this number and I imagine you'll get raises faster than the limit will increase. This is where you push your employer to have an opt-in plan with a automatic minimum contribution so people have to opt out if they don't want to contribute. After all, it doesn't matter if you're highly compensated if you can get the plan to pass.
Edit: rarely is too strong, they last increased it in 2011, but the reasoning still holds.
Post by WinterWine on Oct 24, 2014 18:14:22 GMT -5
Woohoo! I've been watching for these, thanks for posting! Glad to see the 401k limit up as well as HCE... Maybe I can squeeze in one more year after all.
Balls. I didn't know this: "For an IRA contributor who is not covered by a workplace retirement plan and is married to someone who is covered, the deduction is phased out if the couple’s income is between $183,000 and $193,000, up from $181,000 and $191,000."
buffaloeggs.blogspot.com 2016 Races: Hop Hop Half Marathon 2:05:09 Pac Crest Half Ironman 7:13:40 9/10 Aluminum Man Oly Tri 11/27 Space Coast Half Marathon
Awesome! Thanks for posting. This is the first time we will hit max contribution for our 401k and Roth (if we're not phased out). So it'll give me another goal for next year.
Stupid question, but since it is being discussed here: what difference does being a "highly compensated employee" make to the highly compensated employee?
v It depends upon how your employers 401k plan is structured. But for some plans, once you hit $115k ($120k next year) your contributions are limited to 12% of your income. So you can no longer contribute the federal max until your income rises to where 12% is 18k ($150k).
I'm super close this year and may try to take a few unpaid vacation days around the holidays to keep my income under. It's annoying that our plan does this, but really a problem I'm lucky to have.
Edited since apparently I can't spell anything right on my phone.
Here's a pretty good description of why it is done:
Every year, the IRS requires all 401k plans (except safe-harbor plans, as described below) to take a discrimination test. Most easily pass it. Still, just under 40 percent of plans polled by the Plan Sponsor Council of America reported refunding or restricting HCE contributions in order to pass the test. And, 16.7 percent of plans reported returning excess contributions.
The reason for the test is "Congress didn't want these considerable tax breaks to be only enjoyed by the HCEs. This is the way they encourage employers to let everyone play in the pool," said Martha Priddy Patterson, analyst with Deloitte & Touche LLP's Human Capital Advisory Services group.
The test requires that employees be split into two groups: highly compensated and nonhighly compensated. For the 2013 and 2014 tax years, highly compensated employees are those who earned more than $115,000, or owned more than 5 percent of the business. (The compensation limit is based on the previous year's compensation, while the ownership limit is based on the previous or current year.)
The test is as follows: the average contributions of highly compensated employees, as a group, cannot exceed the average contributions of nonhighly compensated employees, as a group, by more than about 2 percent. (Age-50 catch-up contributions are not included in discrimination testing.) If the HCEs exceed this threshold and the employer fails to correct the imbalance, the plan could lose its tax-qualified status and all contributions and earnings would have to be distributed to all plan participants. In addition to the 2 percent spread, the contributions of all HCEs as a group may not be more than two times the percentage of other employees' contributions.
Consequently, HCE contribution levels are based on the contributions of non-HCEs. By setting up this carrot-and-stick system, Congress made it in the best interest of highly compensated employees to encourage non-HCEs to contribute to the plan.
Would HR be able to tell you if limits are in effect for HCE? H is getting a promotion next year that will likely put him close to or just within the limits.
y4m -- I know about discrimination testing (thank you, law firm, for my safe harbor contribution and "profit sharing" contributions that result from all of that!). Just didn't understand why employees would know or care where they fell on the HCE spectrum and discrimination testing didn't seem to be the answer (or at least, I know about discrimination testing and whether I was above or below that line has never seemed to affect me personally).