Post by Velvetshady on Oct 25, 2014 10:29:58 GMT -5
I guess I'm more a history buff than most, but I thought it was pretty common knowledge about Hamilton--I mean it is the unstated reason the founders put in the "nature-born citizen" requirement for President.
I didn't know a couple of these, but there were ones that I don't know enough about the actual person to have guessed race (mostly the writers).
Post by 2curlydogs on Oct 25, 2014 13:17:04 GMT -5
Ok so with regard to Queen Charlotte... The ancestor they cite lived in the 13th century. So... I'm not discounting the fact, but it seems like a but of a stretch to say she was passing based on an ancestor who lived 500 years prior.
I guess I'm more a history buff than most, but I thought it was pretty common knowledge about Hamilton--I mean it is the unstated reason the founders put in the "nature-born citizen" requirement for President.
I didn't know a couple of these, but there were ones that I don't know enough about the actual person to have guessed race (mostly the writers).
I'm not sure the natural-born citizen requirement is only because Hamilton was black. More that too many people just didn't like him. Lol. He was also an "illegitimate" birth. And pretty partisan.
Ok so with regard to Queen Charlotte... The ancestor they cite lived in the 13th century. So... I'm not discounting the fact, but it seems like a but of a stretch to say she was passing based on an ancestor who lived 500 years prior.
And it's similarly odd to claim a Medici with the nickname Il Moro was trying to pass.
I guess I'm more a history buff than most, but I thought it was pretty common knowledge about Hamilton--I mean it is the unstated reason the founders put in the "nature-born citizen" requirement for President.
I didn't know a couple of these, but there were ones that I don't know enough about the actual person to have guessed race (mostly the writers).
I'm not sure the natural-born citizen requirement is only because Hamilton was black. More that too many people just didn't like him. Lol. He was also an "illegitimate" birth. And pretty partisan.
Ok so with regard to Queen Charlotte... The ancestor they cite lived in the 13th century. So... I'm not discounting the fact, but it seems like a but of a stretch to say she was passing based on an ancestor who lived 500 years prior.
And it's similarly odd to claim a Medici with the nickname Il Moro was trying to pass.
Right? I thought this was common knowledge (in his time, and if you study the Medici at all).
I guess I'm more a history buff than most, but I thought it was pretty common knowledge about Hamilton--I mean it is the unstated reason the founders put in the "nature-born citizen" requirement for President.
I didn't know a couple of these, but there were ones that I don't know enough about the actual person to have guessed race (mostly the writers).
I'm not sure the natural-born citizen requirement is only because Hamilton was black. More that too many people just didn't like him. Lol. He was also an "illegitimate" birth. And pretty partisan.
That's why I said unstated--I think the whole National Bank vs State Bank debate, the illegitimate thing, and that enough of the Founders didn't like him to pass such a rule where the stated reasons. He managed to have issues with both Jefferson and Adams, that didn't help much.
Some of these were a stretch. I really couldn't find anything that says Beethoven was more than 1/16th or 1/32nd black. I mean that's a very small ass drop ffs. The same thing seemed to be the case for Jackie O.
And some of these people were not "passing." King Tut doesn't count as passing and neither do Pushkin or Dumas. Now granted, I didn't know Pushkin was black but I don't see anything that indicates he was playing at being white. There was someone else too but it was last night and I can't remember.
Re: Hamilton--given that they got his paternity wrong (named his mother's long estranged husband as his father when his father was merchant in the islands) I'm not sure I 100% sure I take their word for it.