Have you googled yet? "St. Louis arches and New Black Panthers" for 3 source of the news I spoke of (that you will not see on MSNBC, NBC or CBS.) 2 are biased print sources and one is a local TV reporter. Local police, and the Feds involved - this is not made up. I accept your apology in advance.
"This prick is asking for someone here to bring him to task Somebody give me some dirt on this vacuous mass so we can at last unmask him I'll pull the trigger on it, someone load the gun and cock it While we were all watching, he got Washington in his pocket."
"Not gonna lie; I kind of keep expecting you to post one day that you threw down on someone who clearly had no idea that today was NOT THEIR DAY." ~dontcallmeshirley
Pixy - I totally get why you & pretty much everyone on the board is fed up with Lys's style. It's easy for me to scroll past but it's understandable that some people can't help but respond with snark, esp in emotionally-charged threads. However, she's not worth this fight and definitely not worth stepping down over.
I think a lot of Lys's posts are an attempt to point out hypocrisy or a double standard. The problem is she never explains that. Like the black panther thing. She needed to add, "why are we talking about X when Y is happening, which IMO is more serious." Or something. So it comes off as completely unrelated to the OP but in her mind it's not - I think. I'm just guessing.
Pixy - I totally get why you & pretty much everyone on the board is fed up with Lys's style. It's easy for me to scroll past but it's understandable that some people can't help but respond with snark, esp in emotionally-charged threads. However, she's not worth this fight and definitely not worth stepping down over.
I think a lot of Lys's posts are an attempt to point out hypocrisy or a double standard. The problem is she never explains that. Like the black panther thing. She needed to add, "why are we talking about X when Y is happening, which IMO is more serious." Or something. So it comes off as completely unrelated to the OP but in her mind it's not - I think. I'm just guessing.
I love you. You're giving her way too much credit. IMO she doesn't even believe 99% of the stuff she posts anymore. She does it for a reaction.
Pixy - I totally get why you & pretty much everyone on the board is fed up with Lys's style. It's easy for me to scroll past but it's understandable that some people can't help but respond with snark, esp in emotionally-charged threads. However, she's not worth this fight and definitely not worth stepping down over.
I think a lot of Lys's posts are an attempt to point out hypocrisy or a double standard. The problem is she never explains that. Like the black panther thing. She needed to add, "why are we talking about X when Y is happening, which IMO is more serious." Or something. So it comes off as completely unrelated to the OP but in her mind it's not - I think. I'm just guessing.
I love you. You're giving her way to much credit. IMO she doesn't even believe 99% of the stuff she posts anymore. She does it for a reaction.
Pixy - I totally get why you & pretty much everyone on the board is fed up with Lys's style. It's easy for me to scroll past but it's understandable that some people can't help but respond with snark, esp in emotionally-charged threads. However, she's not worth this fight and definitely not worth stepping down over.
I think a lot of Lys's posts are an attempt to point out hypocrisy or a double standard. The problem is she never explains that. Like the black panther thing. She needed to add, "why are we talking about X when Y is happening, which IMO is more serious." Or something. So it comes off as completely unrelated to the OP but in her mind it's not - I think. I'm just guessing.
I love you. You're giving her way to much credit. IMO she doesn't even believe 99% of the stuff she posts anymore. She does it for a reaction.
that could definitely be. I see similar things on FB so I just mentally picture her speaking for them.
Like the black panther thing. She needed to add, "why are we talking about X when Y is happening, which IMO is more serious."
No, she says that often... about black people.
Let's not talk about the violent white militarized police force. Let's talk about violent blacks panthers, because that's more important. Let's not talk about GZ killing TM. Let's talk about blacks killing blacks, because that's more important. This is *precisely* why I feel she is a racist who should not be allowed to further her racist comments using this forum.
BUT I AM MOVING (mooing) ON. GIVE ME CLOSURE, ORIGAMI.