Post by aussiecrush on Dec 17, 2015 1:08:43 GMT -5
Can someone please tell me what the damn autism article is about? Clearly it wasn't some touching post about the nice mall Santa and I'd like to know if there's someone acting like an ass.
Can someone please tell me what the damn autism article is about? Clearly it wasn't some touching post about the nice mall Santa and I'd like to know if there's acting like an ass.
I cannot say with 100% certainty. It will have to be someone more in the behind-the-scenes know, like catbus or @natariru. I am merely a lurker.
Lol. You guys, flex deletes stuff like this all the time. Like, at least quarterly.
Let's get back to Hitler cookies. That was a good set of threads. Miso, can you post wannabe's version?
hey wait a minute. Before you jump to contusions, specks, let me explain what happened. There was a reported thread so I went to the "reported" request. A poster asked that it be deleted...the whole thread. Globals and admins have the option to delete a single post in a thread OR the entire thread. I clicked on the wrong link and I accidentally deleted the entire thread.
I own up to any of my deliberate overstepping of boundaries, BUT this time it was purely an accident. It was not deliberate nor was I giving in to my lust for power.
"Why would you ruin perfectly good peanuts by adding candy corn? That's like saying hey, I have these awesome nachos, guess I better add some dryer lint." - Nonny
Lol. You guys, flex deletes stuff like this all the time. Like, at least quarterly.
Let's get back to Hitler cookies. That was a good set of threads. Miso, can you post wannabe's version?
hey wait a minute. Before you jump to contusions, specks, let me explain what happened. There was a reported thread so I went to the "reported" request. A poster asked that it be deleted...the whole thread. Globals and admins have the option to delete a single post in a thread OR the entire thread. I clicked on the wrong link and I accidentally deleted the entire thread.
I own up to deliberate overstepping of boundaries, BUT this time it was purely an accident. It was not deliberate nor was I giving in to my lust for power.
Are you threatening to beat me up? Help! Flex is after me and she brought a moose for back up! I don't actually care, I just like to rib ya.
hey wait a minute. Before you jump to contusions, specks, let me explain what happened. There was a reported thread so I went to the "reported" request. A poster asked that it be deleted...the whole thread. Globals and admins have the option to delete a single post in a thread OR the entire thread. I clicked on the wrong link and I accidentally deleted the entire thread.
I own up to deliberate overstepping of boundaries, BUT this time it was purely an accident. It was not deliberate nor was I giving in to my lust for power.
Are you threatening to beat me up? Help! Flex is after me and she brought a moose for back up! I don't actually care, I just like to rib ya.
LOLz
Andplusalso, I didn't even read what the thread was about. After I deleted the darn thing, I went back to watch t.v. I went back to my laptop and I didn't even know about the furor until I saw that one of the admins had paged me. Oi.
"Why would you ruin perfectly good peanuts by adding candy corn? That's like saying hey, I have these awesome nachos, guess I better add some dryer lint." - Nonny
Omg you guys. Of course it was Flex. OF COURSE lol. I love her, but shit. This is like her thing.
Also, what was with the freak out over the stupid article in the first place? Someone likes an article on FB and...that means she is shaming mothers? Excited about autism diagnoses? WTF knows because a "like" doesn't give you much info. But I am someone who took ADs while pregnant and was not remotely offended by that article so WTF do I know I guess.
This is where I stand on it. Liking a news article reporting science is not offensive, in my opinion. That's why I asked for clarification of the nature of the article. All indications are that it was a very straightforward report of the research.
Omg you guys. Of course it was Flex. OF COURSE lol. I love her, but shit. This is like her thing.
Also, what was with the freak out over the stupid article in the first place? Someone likes an article on FB and...that means she is shaming mothers? Excited about autism diagnoses? WTF knows because a "like" doesn't give you much info. But I am someone who took ADs while pregnant and was not remotely offended by that article so WTF do I know I guess.
I thought it was going to be some terribly homophobic or Islamaphobic article when I first read the thread. I'm still unclear on why a like was so incriminating if it was a science article.
"Why would you ruin perfectly good peanuts by adding candy corn? That's like saying hey, I have these awesome nachos, guess I better add some dryer lint." - Nonny
This is where I stand on it. Liking a news article reporting science is not offensive, in my opinion. That's why I asked for clarification of the nature of the article. All indications are that it was a very straightforward report of the research.
So not anything like the @deej situation. (FTR, MMM actually did shun her but she was still happily posting on other boards until it got rehashed elsewhere.)
I just find it total bullshit to come on and post about something a fellow GBCNer did on FB but be unwilling to actually talk to that person about it, then decide to hide it. WTF, the board isn't secret.
This is where I stand on it. Liking a news article reporting science is not offensive, in my opinion. That's why I asked for clarification of the nature of the article. All indications are that it was a very straightforward report of the research.
Wow. This is a very innocent article. I mean, it is an attempt to explain and not discourage mothers from taking ADs as needed during pregnancy. I can't believe this was stewed on all day and resulted in a "call out" lol.