Donald Drumpf TUESDAY

[carmenere]

Dec 12, 2017 9:19:51 GMT -5 ECB said:

Dec 12, 2017 9:15:27 GMT -5 carmenere said:

My mind went to corruption/receiving some type of quid pro quo because we know Trump has done that, but it really could go either way.

With how gross he is and the fact that she's a woman, I ABSOLUTELY think he was making a sexual reference.  Anything to debase her.  

I liked your post because it is probably true (that he would say anything to debase her, not that she did anything for donations) but then I unliked because it's just so fucking disgusting.

I still think it's likely that Trump also tried to buy political favors.

[silva]

Dec 12, 2017 8:48:29 GMT -5 AAM2012 said:

Dec 12, 2017 8:39:53 GMT -5 miniroller said:

Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!

*Mika is PISSED! Has challenged SHS to stand up for women & say she can’t work for as this man’s mouthpiece any longer.

And would do anything for them?

So gross!

Right? So that to me implies the very thing Trump has been accused of by the 19 women. Jesus, he’s so fucking vile.

[sushi]

Dec 12, 2017 9:19:51 GMT -5 ECB said:

Dec 12, 2017 9:15:27 GMT -5 carmenere said:

My mind went to corruption/receiving some type of quid pro quo because we know Trump has done that, but it really could go either way.

With how gross he is and the fact that she's a woman, I ABSOLUTELY think he was making a sexual reference.  Anything to debase her.  

I believe it's more likely to be sexual. However, I believe both possibilities equally if that makes any sense. He's a sexual predator AND corrupt as fuck.

[Velar Fricative]

Okay Dems, take that sexist bullshit tweet and DO SOMETHING.

[bowies]

Gillibrand was one of the Senators who called for his resignation yesterday based on the sexual assault allegations. He meant for that tweet to sound like it did. He’ll deny it though.

[mbcdefg]

Dec 12, 2017 9:56:15 GMT -5 bowies said:

Gillibrand was one of the Senators who called for his resignation yesterday based on the sexual assault allegations. He meant for that tweet to sound like it did. He’ll deny it though.

He'll just send Sanders out to deny it and then he'll keep reaffirming it. 

[biscoffcookies]

Re: the Gillibrand tweet -- the press is citing one of her aides this morning as saying she only ever met with him once, it was in 2010, and Ivanka was there.

It's so depressing that they have to dignify that Tweet with a response/denial.

[miniroller]

Dec 12, 2017 9:56:15 GMT -5 bowies said:

Gillibrand was one of the Senators who called for his resignation yesterday based on the sexual assault allegations. He meant for that tweet to sound like it did. He’ll deny it though.

And I just wanna THROW something that his denials will be accepted, GOP’ers won’t even give it a second glance, but just continue to ram that tax bill forward! It constantly infuriates me that this is the world in which we currently live😐

[DotAndBuzz]

Dec 12, 2017 9:56:15 GMT -5 bowies said:

Gillibrand was one of the Senators who called for his resignation yesterday based on the sexual assault allegations. He meant for that tweet to sound like it did. He’ll deny it though.

I'm going to call it now.  Her (eta: SHS's) response will be along the lines of:

"I think it speaks to the disgraceful state of our mainstream media that they make the assumption that the comment was sexual in nature. Of course it wasn't, and if that's where your minds go, that's your problem, not mine, or the President's."

[WanderingWinoZ]

Dec 12, 2017 10:02:09 GMT -5 DotAndBuzz said:

Dec 12, 2017 9:56:15 GMT -5 bowies said:

Gillibrand was one of the Senators who called for his resignation yesterday based on the sexual assault allegations. He meant for that tweet to sound like it did. He’ll deny it though.

I'm going to call it now.  Her response will be along the lines of:

"I think it speaks to the disgraceful state of our mainstream media that they make the assumption that the comment was sexual in nature. Of course it wasn't, and if that's where your minds go, that's your problem, not mine, or the President's."

you are getting pretty good at channeling SHS

[DotAndBuzz]

Dec 12, 2017 10:03:00 GMT -5 WanderingWinoZ said:

Dec 12, 2017 10:02:09 GMT -5 DotAndBuzz said:

I'm going to call it now.  Her response will be along the lines of:

"I think it speaks to the disgraceful state of our mainstream media that they make the assumption that the comment was sexual in nature. Of course it wasn't, and if that's where your minds go, that's your problem, not mine, or the President's."

you are getting pretty good at channeling SHS

She’s predictable, and her responses are all the same. Blame the media, deflect away from the president, call into question the motives/morality of the accuser, delivered with a side of snide arrogance.

And also - 

[miniroller]

Not directly 45-related, but I know we’ve discussed the fragility of net neutrality & our fear that the end is nigh. Here’s an article stipulating how much your congressperson took from top ISP’s:
www.theverge.com/2017/12/11/16746230/net-neutrality-fcc-isp-congress-campaign-contribution

Please Call! They vote in TWO days!
(Sorry- I was trying to copy the link to the script from 5calls.org but couldn’t get it to properly post without my location information)

[ginandjucie24]

Dec 12, 2017 9:07:32 GMT -5 Jalapeñomel said:

Dec 12, 2017 8:59:18 GMT -5 4speedy said:

Mr. Trump’s difficult adjustment to the presidency, people close to him say, is rooted in an unrealistic expectation of its powers, which he had assumed to be more akin to the popular image of imperial command than the sloppy reality of having to coexist with two other branches of government.

Read more: pandce.proboards.com/thread/589947/donald-drumpf-tuesday?page=1#ixzz513T9QmDJ


He TOTALLY thought he was going to be in command of B-613.  What a crushing disappointment that must have been to him.  LOL.

I also believed he thought that he could just make laws and people would abide by them. 

I saw an interview with him a few months back (I will try to find it). He seriously thought that on day one of his presidency he would have a repeal and replace bill on his desk to sign. He seem so shocked that it wasn’t there. 

[mbcdefg]

Trump sends sexually suggestive and demeaning tweet about Gillibrand


www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/12/12/trump-sends-sexually-suggestive-and-demeaning-tweet-about-gillibrand/?utm_term=.86b71987de6e

Trump offered no evidence to support his wink-and-nod claim that Gillibrand had gone to him “begging” for campaign donations “and would do anything for them.” In fact, according to Open Secrets, a nonprofit website that tracks campaign contributions, since 1996, Trump has donated $8,900 to Sen. Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and $5,850 to Gillibrand.

[cous0226]

Dec 12, 2017 9:05:20 GMT -5 WanderingWinoZ said:

Dec 12, 2017 8:39:53 GMT -5 miniroller said:

Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!

*Mika is PISSED! Has challenged SHS to stand up for women & say she can’t work for as this man’s mouthpiece any longer.

wtf is he talking about? Bill Clinton? Is her husband Bill? Who got used here?  Trump was used just for $$ or Kristen used bill??  

Why does he always refer to himself in 3rd person???

I "think" what the mad man is trying to say and what I heard over the weekend that Kirsten use to be buddies with Bill and Hillary but then she turned on them.  I don't know if it was the Bill women stuff specifically or Hillary related.   So 45 sees her as disloyal now to the Clintons.  Go figure - he is sticking up for the Clintons lol

[erbear]

Dec 12, 2017 8:39:53 GMT -5 miniroller said:

Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!

*Mika is PISSED! Has challenged SHS to stand up for women & say she can’t work for as this man’s mouthpiece any longer.

The sexual insinuation about Gillibrand here (a fucking US Senator) is disgusting.

[mbcdefg]

Dec 12, 2017 10:31:30 GMT -5 cous0226 said:

Dec 12, 2017 9:05:20 GMT -5 WanderingWinoZ said:

wtf is he talking about? Bill Clinton? Is her husband Bill? Who got used here?  Trump was used just for $$ or Kristen used bill??  

Why does he always refer to himself in 3rd person???

I "think" what the mad man is trying to say and what I heard over the weekend that Kirsten use to be buddies with Bill and Hillary but then she turned on them.  I don't know if it was the Bill women stuff specifically or Hillary related.   So 45 sees her as disloyal now to the Clintons.  Go figure - he is sticking up for the Clintons lol

From that article I linked to above:

Gillibrand, however, does have her critics. After she said in November that former president Bill Clinton should have resigned the presidency following his inappropriate affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, longtime Hillary Clinton adviser and confidant Philippe Reines excoriated her on Twitter for being ungrateful and two-faced.



“Ken Starr spent $70 million on a consensual blowjob,” Reines wrote. “Senate voted to keep POTUS WJC. But not enough for you @sengillibrand? Over 20 yrs you took the Clintons’ endorsements, money, and seat. Hypocrite. Interesting strategy for 2020 primaries. Best of luck.”

[5thofjuly]

Dec 12, 2017 9:33:18 GMT -5 Velar Fricative said:

Okay Dems, take that sexist bullshit tweet and DO SOMETHING.

So my fear is that the vast majority of people (outside of people like us) just don't give a shit about sexism. The message likely tests poorly. That's terrible because it means that to keep the people in power who will do something about sexism they can't talk about doing anything about sexism.

[WanderingWinoZ]

[Pom]

Dec 12, 2017 10:08:43 GMT -5 DotAndBuzz said:

Dec 12, 2017 10:03:00 GMT -5 WanderingWinoZ said:

you are getting pretty good at channeling SHS

She’s predictable, and her responses are all the same. Blame the media, deflect away from the president, call into question the motives/morality of the accuser, delivered with a side of snide arrogance.

And also - 

I accidentally called her Suckabee Sanders last night. I get so mad at her bullshit, I can't speak. But yeah, seems apt.

[WanderingWinoZ]

Dec 12, 2017 10:25:57 GMT -5 ginandjucie24 said:

Dec 12, 2017 9:07:32 GMT -5 Jalapeñomel said:

I also believed he thought that he could just make laws and people would abide by them. 

I saw an interview with him a few months back (I will try to find it). He seriously thought that on day one of his presidency he would have a repeal and replace bill on his desk to sign. He seem so shocked that it wasn’t there. 

talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-only-honor-is-corruption

To the President, soliciting political contributions creates a bond of subservience against which any subsequent caviling about mammoth political differences is either sleazy, hypocritical or disloyal.



What it all amounts is that personal loyalty, a kind of mafia-like allegiance, is the only legitimate mode of interaction. Which is to say, in Trumpthink, only corruption has legitimacy.

[pinkeggs]

Dec 12, 2017 9:35:06 GMT -5 @stilljustash said:

Dec 12, 2017 9:04:15 GMT -5 bowies said:

...Did the President just call a female Senator a whore?

you mean did he just deny countless sexual harassment allegations and then immediately turn around and sexually harass a Senator on twitter for the world to see?

why, yes. yes, he did.

This is what has me enraged today. He was VERY deliberate with that "willing to do anything for it" line. He knows he's teflon, and he is intentionally mocking the current climate and momentum of women coming forward. He's taunting because he knows no one will do a fucking thing to him. It literally makes me want to pull out my hair. 

[heat40]

I’ve read the Clinton’s helped Gillibrand a lot with funding and connections. Which is why people say it was interesting that she was saying Bill should have resigned. He’s alluding to that.

The “will do anything” thing was completely sexist and he knows that. He gives himself enough vagueness so he can deny what he meant. They do this shit all the time.

[mbcdefg]

The Trumps voted by absentee ballot in the NYC mayoral election last month:



Melania didn't sign the envelope as required.

Ivanka only mailed hers back on Election Day, which was too late.

Jared didn't mail his ballot back at all.

And Trump got his own birthday wrong.

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/melania-ivanka-jared-mayoral-election-votes-didn-count-article-1.3692124

[sushi]

I suck at being an adult much of the time. I can still manage to vote absentee for over 10 years now.

[WanderingWinoZ]

Dec 12, 2017 11:37:13 GMT -5 c7 said:

Dec 12, 2017 11:29:14 GMT -5 mbcdefg said:

The Trumps voted by absentee ballot in the NYC mayoral election last month:



Melania didn't sign the envelope as required.

Ivanka only mailed hers back on Election Day, which was too late.

Jared didn't mail his ballot back at all.

And Trump got his own birthday wrong.

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/melania-ivanka-jared-mayoral-election-votes-didn-count-article-1.3692124

The President can vote in local elections? I had no idea.

LOFL that he got his own dang birthday wrong.

also... voter disenfranchisement for the dumb!
I think this is also a big issue b/c the GOP really hates that people (like students) vote where they live & not their permanent home address. I would think that moving to a new city  & having a house would disqualify you from voting at your old address

[mrsd2006]

Dec 12, 2017 11:29:14 GMT -5 mbcdefg said:

The Trumps voted by absentee ballot in the NYC mayoral election last month:



Melania didn't sign the envelope as required.

Ivanka only mailed hers back on Election Day, which was too late.

Jared didn't mail his ballot back at all.

And Trump got his own birthday wrong.

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/melania-ivanka-jared-mayoral-election-votes-didn-count-article-1.3692124

Why is this information not confidential? 

[DotAndBuzz]

Dec 12, 2017 11:42:37 GMT -5 WanderingWinoZ said:

Dec 12, 2017 11:37:13 GMT -5 c7 said:

The President can vote in local elections? I had no idea.

LOFL that he got his own dang birthday wrong.

also... voter disenfranchisement for the dumb!
I think this is also a big issue b/c the GOP really hates that people (like students) vote where they live & not their permanent home address. I would think that moving to a new city  & having a house would disqualify you from voting at your old address

Perhaps despite their claims to the contrary, they weren't planning on being allowed to stay in their new residence very long.

[cous0226]

Dec 12, 2017 11:29:14 GMT -5 mbcdefg said:

The Trumps voted by absentee ballot in the NYC mayoral election last month:



Melania didn't sign the envelope as required.

Ivanka only mailed hers back on Election Day, which was too late.

Jared didn't mail his ballot back at all.

And Trump got his own birthday wrong.

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/melania-ivanka-jared-mayoral-election-votes-didn-count-article-1.3692124

So they’re all fucking morons not just 45. Good to know.

[aliciabella]

This was interesting....