A friend on facebook

[Deleted]

I honestly can't tell. I'm on a ipad with the lighting low but I couldn't see them even when looking. So it's possible people aren't focused on it. And I bet it looks OK in person.

[azurely]

I am dying for this girl and her wedding pics. I hope her photographer photoshops them out, but there will still be tons of photos taken by friends and family... I'm cringing for her.

[fryjack2]

I hope she refuses to pay her photographer until they photoshop all the nips out.

If this were me, I wouldn't be dying because someone saw my nipples (who cares, its a nipple), I would be dying of embarrassment that people might think I'm too dumb to realize my boobs were in full view.

I get not wanting to wear a bra, but they make nipple covers. She needs better friends!

[daisybuchannan]

Agog.

[daisybuchannan]

Agog.

[iamgrace]

OH
NO

[winston]

Mar 31, 2013 8:36:18 GMT -5 fryjack2 said:

I hope she refuses to pay her photographer until they photoshop all the nips out.

If this were me, I wouldn't be dying because someone saw my nipples (who cares, its a nipple), I would be dying of embarrassment that people might think I'm too dumb to realize my boobs were in full view.

I get not wanting to wear a bra, but they make nipple covers. She needs better friends!

I disagree with this. These obviously aren't pro pics and we don't know what the pro pics look like, but that would be a ton of extra editing. The photographer didn't put her in a see-through dress with no bra. It would be nice for the photographer to hide her nipples in every picture for her, but she should not refuse to pay for a service because she didn't dress properly.

Don't get me wrong, I feel awful for her, but making the photographer pay for her error would be a real asshole thing to do.

[janiejones]

Mar 30, 2013 22:07:41 GMT -5 Nugget T. Brain, The OG said:

Mar 30, 2013 22:04:50 GMT -5 speckledfrog said:

She must be blind if she didn't see that. OMG, I would have to fake my death.

I'm guessing it's one of those dresses where it looks fine, until someone with a flash takes a picture. 

Our big retiree dinner at work, where I sat next to the president of our company all night?
You can totally see my bra through my sweater in every picture. I'm mortified.  But my CWs swear they couldn't see it at all, so it was the damn flash!

[cheeseandcrackers]

dude.. my boobs are a lot smaller then hers and I always wear a bra out.
yikes.

[fryjack2]

Mar 31, 2013 9:08:12 GMT -5 winston said:

Mar 31, 2013 8:36:18 GMT -5 fryjack2 said:

I hope she refuses to pay her photographer until they photoshop all the nips out.

If this were me, I wouldn't be dying because someone saw my nipples (who cares, its a nipple), I would be dying of embarrassment that people might think I'm too dumb to realize my boobs were in full view.

I get not wanting to wear a bra, but they make nipple covers. She needs better friends!

I disagree with this. These obviously aren't pro pics and we don't know what the pro pics look like, but that would be a ton of extra editing. The photographer didn't put her in a see-through dress with no bra. It would be nice for the photographer to hide her nipples in every picture for her, but she should not refuse to pay for a service because she didn't dress properly.

Don't get me wrong, I feel awful for her, but making the photographer pay for her error would be a real asshole thing to do.

I figured the ones posted were from a friend's camera, not pro pics?

I do agree to some extent that the photographer shouldnt pay for her choice in a wearing a see through dress, but they edit out pimples and wacky hair and other stuff when making a wedding album, so why is this any different?  Not trying to be snarky, I'm honestly wondering.  Its not like she would be asking the photographer to make her long white dress look short and rainbow colored in every picture.  I figure its part of making the pictures look good?  Isn't that part of why a pro is hired?

[winston]

Mar 31, 2013 9:20:46 GMT -5 fryjack2 said:

Mar 31, 2013 9:08:12 GMT -5 winston said:

I disagree with this. These obviously aren't pro pics and we don't know what the pro pics look like, but that would be a ton of extra editing. The photographer didn't put her in a see-through dress with no bra. It would be nice for the photographer to hide her nipples in every picture for her, but she should not refuse to pay for a service because she didn't dress properly.

Don't get me wrong, I feel awful for her, but making the photographer pay for her error would be a real asshole thing to do.

I figured the ones posted were from a friend's camera, not pro pics?

I do agree to some extent that the photographer shouldnt pay for her choice in a wearing a see through dress, but they edit out pimples and wacky hair and other stuff when making a wedding album, so why is this any different?  Not trying to be snarky, I'm honestly wondering.  Its not like she would be asking the photographer to make her long white dress look short and rainbow colored in every picture.  I figure its part of making the pictures look good?  Isn't that part of why a pro is hired?

Yeah, I said that these obviously aren't pro pics and that we don't know what the pro pics look like.

To some extent, yes.  And definitely if there's an album. One of my friends got married last year and her MOH has a tattoo that was really obvious in the BM dress my friend picked out. She asked her photographer to photoshop out the tattoo in every picture and the photographer explained that that kind of work actually takes a lot of time and would likely look unnatural. He also said that the amount of time it would take to edit a tattoo out of every picture of the MOH would be something he'd have to charge extra for because small fixes (like pimples, I guess) are easy and quick, but big changes take a lot of extra work. He suggested either going with the tattoo or having the MOH wear a jacket  or something to cover it because then it wouldn't show up at all, if the bride was really bothered by it.

I was in a wedding last year and one of the other bridesmaids had really bad acne. I mean, really, really bad.  I feel for this girl, it has to be hard.  She didn't want her picture taken most of the day, but that's hard because she was in the wedding. I saw my friend's pics when she got them back and the photographer was able to minimize the appearance of the acne, but she couldn't give her flawless skin. 

I know with our own wedding pictures we didn't get a ton of retouching.  It looks like our photographer probably corrected the colour and took out my MOH's blemishes in the close-ups of her, but not in all of the pictures. I guess it depends on the level of retouching you pay for, and I think a lot of photographers do more for the album images, based on what I remember from the knot.

[Jalapeñomel]

Mar 31, 2013 1:20:27 GMT -5 elle said:

I honestly can't tell. I'm on a ipad with the lighting low but I couldn't see them even when looking. So it's possible people aren't focused on it. And I bet it looks OK in person.

Me neither. I had to go back and re-look at them to see what I was missing.  And really I don't think I would've noticed had someone not pointed it out to me.