Post by fussbucket on Jan 11, 2013 17:12:22 GMT -5
Check out her new official portrait.
Hard to tell if he went with the "raging hormones" look, or the "up all night puking my guts out" look, or perhaps even a forward-looking "kid up all night was nursing every hour" look.
I think the painting itself is fine- the problem is he picked her w/ a "pinched" look, that I just don't think is good, at all. I wished they had picked one where she is genuinely smiling.
Post by BettyBookWorm on Jan 12, 2013 9:42:59 GMT -5
They made her look considerably older than she is. She is also much prettier. Maybe she was having a tired day or something. I would fire that portrait painter.
The undereye bags are a LITTLE true to life (she looked GORGEOUS on her wedding day, but let's be honest... there was some baggage there). But the rest of it... NO! Off with that artist's head!
The royals don't strike me as the type to have big ol' smiles on their faces for official portraits. They are supposed to convey seriousness, benevolence, and introspection.
But, yeah, dude could have left out the undereye bags and wrinkles.
Post by flamingeaux on Jan 14, 2013 12:14:21 GMT -5
here's the suri's burn book post about it
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I knew having a portrait artist in my pocket was going to come in handy one of these days. The royal portraitist owed me a favor, so when I told him to paint Kate Middleton with baggy eyes — one bag bigger than the other — and a smug smirk, he really didn’t have a choice.