Because I feel like starting shit

[Deleted]

You'll all be pleased to know that our conversations here are fodder for Arbor's twitter feed and we're all a bunch of fucking idiots who don't know shit.

YWIA!

[caden]

Tha fuck?

ETA: I'll just go out on a limb and assume that since she's defriending and blocking GBCNers she's also trashing us on FB too. Not cool, arbor. Not cool.

[heyjude]

:/

[meshaliuknits]

is the convo at least interesting?

[heyjude]

I don't understand? Are we not allowed to disagree?

[eclaires]

uh, wow. That's really lovely.

[wrathofkuus]

I imagine her twitter followers as a group comprised entirely of men who hire child sex workers.

[Deleted]

Feb 4, 2013 14:04:36 GMT -5 @majorwife said:

you probably should have unfollowed her when you unfriened her on FB.

I didn't unfriend her.

And her twitter is public. She uses it as a bully platform where she can spout off practically unchallenged to her yes crew.

[Velar Fricative]

Feb 4, 2013 14:04:48 GMT -5 heyjude said:

I don't understand? Are we not allowed to disagree?

I'm here.

[caden]

Feb 4, 2013 14:12:09 GMT -5 Velar Fricative said:

Feb 4, 2013 14:04:48 GMT -5 heyjude said:

I don't understand? Are we not allowed to disagree?

I'm here.

Apparently only an idiot would disagree with her and none of us wants to be an idiot, so.....

[eclaires]

Feb 4, 2013 14:04:48 GMT -5 heyjude said:

I don't understand? Are we not allowed to disagree?

I thought so, too.  I know the discussion got a little out of hand and a little snarky (on both sides), but I don't think anyone felt it necessary to go outside of the board and blast everyone for fucking idiots or whatever.

Maybe I just don't understand twitter, though.

[Deleted]

Feb 4, 2013 14:14:49 GMT -5 eclaires said:

Feb 4, 2013 14:04:48 GMT -5 heyjude said:

I don't understand? Are we not allowed to disagree?

I thought so, too.  I know the discussion got a little out of hand and a little snarky (on both sides), but I don't think anyone felt it necessary to go outside of the board and blast everyone for fucking idiots or whatever.

Maybe I just don't understand twitter, though.

this is where I'm at

[Deleted]

I'm still friends with her on FB but it appears she has out me on limited profile.

I know everything is public, but I don't like that if people don't agree with her they must be wrong and are fodder for her twitter.

[IIOY]

This is at least the second time she has taken board drama to places other than the board, yes?

[eclaires]

Yeah, there was a facebook thing a few weeks ago that bothered a lot of us, as well.

[Deleted]

Maybe I'm just odd but I don't feel comfortable taking nest shit out of the nest. Between boards, maybe but never to people who aren't involved in the board in anyway and certainly not to a public forum where people might be encouraged to stop by, kwim?

I also don't like being painted as the worst of humanity and an enemy of "the cause" for having a discussion on a message board.

[caden]

arbor, if you're reading this, I think it's total bullshit that you wouldn't respond to Lola on here, but instead mischaracterized what she said and are now trying to start another war with the group she posted about.

[annieblah]

Feb 4, 2013 14:15:36 GMT -5 @mrsbecky07 said:

I'm still friends with her on FB but it appears she has out me on limited profile.

I know everything is public, but I don't like that if people don't agree with her they must be wrong and are fodder for her twitter.

I am here as well.  I know this is a public board, but this is a bit unnerving.  I am also unnerved that many helped her friend out that was in need, donated money through paypal, and personal info was attached and she has this.  I am really unnerved (no, I am fucking pissed now.  I am not sorry I helped a person in need, but this is some bullshit that she is spouting off).  I am thankful it is just general, but who knows.

[gpw]

Feb 4, 2013 14:17:58 GMT -5 @habbsies said:

Maybe I'm just odd but I don't feel comfortable taking nest shit out of the nest. Between boards, maybe but never to people who aren't involved in the board in anyway and certainly not to a public forum where people might be encouraged to stop by, kwim?

I also don't like being painted as the worst of humanity and an enemy of "the cause" for having a discussion on a message board.

I'm kinda here.  There is the CEP FB page, but that seems different... I don't know.  

*-)

[bluestreet]

Feb 4, 2013 14:17:58 GMT -5 @habbsies said:

Maybe I'm just odd but I don't feel comfortable taking nest shit out of the nest. Between boards, maybe but never to people who aren't involved in the board in anyway and certainly not to a public forum where people might be encouraged to stop by, kwim?

I also don't like being painted as the worst of humanity and an enemy of "the cause" for having a discussion on a message board.

Same here. More than anything, I feel like putting board stuff on FB makes people look like losers.   

[Jermys]

Feb 4, 2013 14:18:25 GMT -5 annieblah said:

Feb 4, 2013 14:15:36 GMT -5 @mrsbecky07 said:

I'm still friends with her on FB but it appears she has out me on limited profile.

I know everything is public, but I don't like that if people don't agree with her they must be wrong and are fodder for her twitter.

I am here as well.  I know this is a public board, but this is a bit unnerving.  I am also unnerved that many helped her friend out that was in need, donated money through paypal, and personal info was attached and she has this.  I am really unnerved (no, I am fucking pissed now.  I am not sorry I helped a person in need, but this is some bullshit that she is spouting off).  I am thankful it is just general, but who knows.

Fuck, I didn't even think of that. Nice. I don't regret helping someone in need either, but it sucks that I gave my info to someone I thought wasn't shady.

Sent from my VM670 using proboards

[gpw]

Feb 4, 2013 14:18:25 GMT -5 annieblah said:

Feb 4, 2013 14:15:36 GMT -5 @mrsbecky07 said:

I'm still friends with her on FB but it appears she has out me on limited profile.

I know everything is public, but I don't like that if people don't agree with her they must be wrong and are fodder for her twitter.

I am here as well.  I know this is a public board, but this is a bit unnerving.  I am also unnerved that many helped her friend out that was in need, donated money through paypal, and personal info was attached and she has this.  I am really unnerved (no, I am fucking pissed now.  I am not sorry I helped a person in need, but this is some bullshit that she is spouting off).  I am thankful it is just general, but who knows.

...and I totally forgot about that.  

[Deleted]

It's different because it involves people here. I don't think there's anyone on the FB group who isn't here. We don't let people in for shits and giggles. If you're apart of the community, then discussing it is fine wherever, I think. It's when you pretty much make inflammatory statements in a place where people who aren't involved can get indignant with you that it becomes a problem.

Because it's pretty much one step away from providing them with a link, especially as it isn't for anyone's amusement but in furtherance of advocacy work that you've made no bones about wanting to be as public and antagonistic as possible.

[heyjude]

Feb 4, 2013 14:18:12 GMT -5 caden said:

arbor, if you're reading this, I think it's total bullshit that you wouldn't respond to Lola on here, but instead mischaracterized what she said and are now trying to start another war with the group she posted about.

WHAT?

[wawa]

For those who aren't tweeters (twitterers? Twits?) she hasn't posted a link to here or named us anything. Just a vaugebookish headdesk vent about how people who have only watched a HBO documentary aren't entitled to an opinion on the topic. Similar to what was posted on FB previously. Not sure if that soothes anybody's concerns, but I figured I'd share anyway.

[Deleted]

Feb 4, 2013 14:26:35 GMT -5 heyjude said:

Feb 4, 2013 14:18:12 GMT -5 caden said:

arbor, if you're reading this, I think it's total bullshit that you wouldn't respond to Lola on here, but instead mischaracterized what she said and are now trying to start another war with the group she posted about.

WHAT?

I could be reading it wrong but it seems to me she's trying to start something with the woman involved in work highlighted by the documentary Lola referenced last night, Very Young Girls.

[annieblah]

Feb 4, 2013 14:25:16 GMT -5 cjoy said:

I thought this kind of thing only happened on ML.

Lollllll.

Sent from my GT-P3113 using proboards

Thanks for your great commentary. We get it, you think we are stupid and not as clever as ML.  broken record.

[annieblah]

Feb 4, 2013 14:30:45 GMT -5 toledo said:

Feb 4, 2013 14:29:57 GMT -5 annieblah said:

Thanks for your great commentary. We get it, you think we are stupid and not as clever as ML.  broken record.

No, I don't think you "got it."

We did, Toledo.  /in my best Debbie Downer voice. 

[Deleted]

Feb 4, 2013 14:28:45 GMT -5 wawa said:

For those who aren't tweeters (twitterers? Twits?) she hasn't posted a link to here or named us anything. Just a vaugebookish headdesk vent about how people who have only watched a HBO documentary aren't entitled to an opinion on the topic. Similar to what was posted on FB previously. Not sure if that soothes anybody's concerns, but I figured I'd share anyway.

You are right. But her inflammatory tone coupled with the way her twitter battles follow, idk, it's a little too much for my tastes, kwim?

[annieblah]

Feb 4, 2013 14:32:29 GMT -5 nuggetbrain said:

Feb 4, 2013 14:29:57 GMT -5 annieblah said:

Thanks for your great commentary. We get it, you think we are stupid and not as clever as ML.  broken record.

....wait, what?

Cjoy posts this every time.  I think it was from when some claimed we were the AP of the Nest or something.  Same shit, different day.