Here's a blurb that touches on architectural preservation and answers from the community of architects in Chicago. I have nothing thought provoking to add but thought some here might find it interesting. There's a video at the link that shows the top three winners of the contest mentioned.
Here in Chicago there has been a debate raging about the fate of Prentice Women’s Hospital, a Bertrand Goldberg building, and this week its fate was determined - and its going down.
Since this summer, a variety of groups have come together, proposing alternative visions for how to accommodate the conflicting interests of preserving Goldberg’s work and accommodating the needs of Northwestern Hospital.
These visions culminated with a competition that the Chicago Architectural Club (CAC) developed in collaboration with AIA Chicago & the Chicago Architecture Foundation.
What’s amazing is that over 100 architects and designers developed ideas (for FREE), in an effort to solve the problem of preserving the building while accommodating Northwestern’s program. The CAC also provoked 10 firms to develop their own projects addressing this challenge.
All of these designs were presented at an event hosted at the Chicago Architecture Foundation. After the winners were announced, a discussion broke out, and I think the most provoking comment offered came from Martin Klaeschen:
“We need to find an infrastructure to preserve the modern heritage that Chicago owns….I think that's a main problem [in the United States] we don't know how to preserve buildings.”
The winning entry is the perfect example of a hybrid approach to solving a preservation problem like this. This country has reached a place in history that needs to account for both our architectural heritage and the thriving economic realities that have made this heritage so valuable.
We are inspired by the relentless efforts of the Chicago architecture community, and those who contributed their ideas to this discussion and hope that their efforts inspire others to stand in front of the wrecking ball when this problem comes to their neighborhood.
Post by mrs.jacinthe on Mar 7, 2013 14:57:10 GMT -5
Boy. That IS ugly. Architecturally significant, perhaps. But hideous. And probably not overly practical financially, based on all those curved concrete walls - it just looks like a maintenance nightmare.
Haha I was involved in designing some of their new hospitals. I spent a couple years of my life devoted to that project. This building (the one they are trying to save)
was replaced with this one.
And attached to this one.
Both shown here:
I wonder if they are going to consider our architect an icon and he buildings worth saving 40 years from now.
It is actually interesting to me that I like it as much as I do, because I have a tendency to to prefer straight edges and angles to circles and rounded edges.