Yeah, jenn did look good, however she was wearing her leggings as footless rights. I'm totally fine with footless rights, I even wear them from time to time.
so my real issue with leggings is when they're too tight and they become sheer, all stretched over the wearers (usually untoned) ass and you can see what color underwear they're wearing or when their (again usally untoned) ass is haning out everywhere. Buuuut, having a toned ass doesn't make it ok either.
Back to the issue of footless tights, if you're going to wear leggings as footless tights, imo is usually too bulky and thick, so why not get actual opaque footless tights? Yeah, I can see leggings as tights in the dead of winter, but id still rather freeze than wear bulky legings as footless tights.
I know, none of this logic makes sense. Flame away.
how were they "footless tights"? my top, yes, covered my butt, but i'm pretty sure following your "is this a dress" logic, it wouldn't be a dress, either. if i sat down, i'm pretty sure my butt would be exposed...i'm not really sure...
how were they "footless tights"? my top, yes, covered my butt, but i'm pretty sure following your "is this a dress" logic, it wouldn't be a dress, either. if i sat down, i'm pretty sure my butt would be exposed...i'm not really sure...
I thought your top was a dress, no? Then disregard the footless tights then.
how were they "footless tights"? my top, yes, covered my butt, but i'm pretty sure following your "is this a dress" logic, it wouldn't be a dress, either. if i sat down, i'm pretty sure my butt would be exposed...i'm not really sure...
I thought your top was a dress, no? Then disregard the footless tights then.
nope. it was a shirt. it was sheer, and definitely cannot be worn as a dress....but my butt wasn't exposed.
Meh. I'm not the fashion police. If you like then and want to wear them, by all means, please do. You're just never going to get me to say that leggings are ever ok in my little world.