Post by NewOrleans on Aug 10, 2014 11:44:39 GMT -5
omfg. First, why is a BB gun considered a toy? Second, I bet the guy was thinking the BB gun was so harmless that the police couldn't possibly be ordering him to drop it. My guess is that he didn't make the connection that they were even talking to him.
So the gunnies will say that this is evidence that guns are stigmatized and that if we had open carry for all, this wouldn't happen because guns would be normal.
The gun control advocates will say that this is evidence that even toy guns have brought misery to us all, that if guns weren't so rampant no one would perceive someone with a "toy" gun as a threat, and that "good guys with guns" are still a myth because they gun down the wrong people.
Too bad the gun industry has fought against laws that would require toy guns to be marked clearly and visibly as such so things like this don't happen.
Incidentally, I've been in the gun aisle at Wal Mart and it was shocking to me how incredibly realistic the toy and BB guns looked. They look almost identical to the real things. I don't blame the police one bit.
Post by stephm0188 on Aug 10, 2014 11:54:16 GMT -5
I feel like there are articles that have been written in an inflammatory manner, including this one. He was not gunned down for holding a toy rifle. Multiple witnesses stated that he was asked several times to drop the gun and he would not. Multiple witnesses stated that he was walking around pointing it at children. Another shopper in the store panicked and went into cardiac arrest. It wasn't just "He was gunned down for holding a toy gun!"
Crosman has this warning label on the box: NOT A TOY. ADULT SUPERVISION REQUIRED. MISUSE OR CARELESS USE MAY CAUSE SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH. BE CAREFUL, SHOOT SAFELY.
"One 911 call released by Beavercreek police was from Ronald Ritchie of Riverside, who was inside Walmart. He told dispatchers at 8:21 p.m. Tuesday that he saw a man “walking around with a gun in the store.”
Ritchie, an ex-Marine, said the man was pointing a black rifle at people near the pet section and that “he’s loading it right now.” Later, he said, “He looked like he was trying to load it, I don’t know.” He then added, “He just pointed it at two children.”
Later, a person on the call can be heard yelling that he’d been shot.
Ritchie’s wife, April, told this newspaper on Wednesday that Crawford was on his cell phone and that people looked at him with disbelief as he held the rifle. The Ritchies said that some scurried in different directions and that three people went into a stock room.
April Ritchie said Crawford held his phone between his left ear and shoulder while moving the rifle around. “He just kept messing with it and I heard it clicking,” she said
Crawford was in the pets department when the police arrived, Ronald Ritchie said.
“We moved up to get a closer view, which is not a good idea, but it happened,” he said. “We were hiding behind an aisle.
After police arrived, April Ritchie said she heard officers warn Crawford. “I heard, put it down, put it down,” she said. “I heard two shots after I saw him turn. He still had the weapon in his hand.”
The Ritchies said the man with the rifle fell backwards when he was struck by the gunshots. But, he got back up and went towards the officer who shot him. That officer then tackled the man with the rifle to the ground.
“He looked like he was going to go violently,” Ronald Ritchie said. “If he would have dropped the weapon, he could have came out with his life. But, unfortunately, he didn’t.”"
ETA: neither account makes a lot of sense. One makes it sound like this kid just randomly attacked a police officer, while the other makes it sound like the police just randomly shot this kid to death for no reason.
"Not gonna lie; I kind of keep expecting you to post one day that you threw down on someone who clearly had no idea that today was NOT THEIR DAY." ~dontcallmeshirley