It's a pre-made PBJ sandwich with the crusts cut off, and it comes in the freezer section. I don't know how anyone else would know what you pack in your kid's lunch, or why you would care what they think.
There is actually a how-to about making a PBJ with the crusts cut off? This requires steps to be posted?
Mind blown
When I was in elementary school, we had an assignment where we had to write out step by step instructions on how to make a pb&j. I got marked off for not specifically putting to remove the lids on the jars. I'm still mad about it.
Is the sugar reduced because it's replaced with something? The jelly itself likely has ~10g of sugar + what's in the bread + any in PB (didn't pull mine out to look if peanuts naturally have any). Personally I go for real sugar/fruit sugar over sugar replacements and therefore don't buy reduced sugar jelly/jam.
Post by dragonfly08 on Sept 15, 2014 6:34:22 GMT -5
In my girls' school, an uncrustable is available every.single.day and is what they serve to a kid who doesn't pack a lunch and has no money on account to buy one. So at least the school isn't classifying it as lacking in nutrition.
That said, I think they're gross and my kids hate them so I wouldn't personally send one and I don't let the kids buy them...if they want a PB&J, I'm happy to send one from home rather than pay $2.90 for the icky processed one. And I even have a Pampered Chef sandwich press thingy so I can make an "uncrustable" if they really want it that way.
Post by imojoebunny on Sept 15, 2014 8:28:11 GMT -5
My kids won't eat them. They don't taste the same as regular PBJ. I think the eyebrows raising at 16 grams of sugar is a little strange. An apple has three times that much sugar, as do most fruits. We use more peanut butter on the sandwiches we make at home, so they have more protein (and fat too :-).
I think they are gross, and would not give DD one. Not to say she never gets treats, but I find them over priced and over processed. I can make a pbj pretty quick!
My kids won't eat them. They don't taste the same as regular PBJ. I think the eyebrows raising at 16 grams of sugar is a little strange. An apple has three times that much sugar, as do most fruits. We use more peanut butter on the sandwiches we make at home, so they have more protein (and fat too :-).
There is a difference between added sugar (such as highly processed jelly) and other sugars.
I simply said it would be my one personal concern if it was a daily thing, but I wouldn't judge it. Kids are supposed to have around a max of 25 grams of added sugar (again, different than an apple) so 14 grams for one sandwich is a lot. If they don't get much other added sugar, its no biggie
Oh lord, people need to get a hobby if this is what's now frowned upon. My kids eat pb&j most days. I don't consider uncrustables much different. If people are looking over their shoulder & judging they can keep it to themselves.
Post by penguingrrl on Sept 15, 2014 9:44:29 GMT -5
I wouldn't buy them because it's way cheaper to make my own pb&j and doesn't take a ton of time even with taking the extra few seconds the cut the crusts off. I wouldn't look down on it at all since pb&j is generally a nutritious meal, although I haven't checked the ingredients. I use natural pb (no added oils or sugar) and reduced sugar jam (the type that has less added sugar and is less sweet tasting, not the type that replaces it with artificial sweeteners). I would imagine it's a lot healthier than many other lunches people routinely send.
Sending an uncrustable around here would get major side eye thrown my way. But I live in a super crunchy area. Lots of moms do the elaborate super-healthy bento boxes for kids lunches.
Post by speckledfrog on Sept 15, 2014 10:03:37 GMT -5
I'm not even the OP and I'm irritated by the smug comments in this thread. "Well, I would never use such a thing." "Oh, I would never feed my child a sugar bomb like that." "My child only eats free range sandwiches made from quinoa, kelp, and the breath of an angel."
OP, clearly there are people who would judge. Thankfully the Lunch Police aren't a real thing so you can send in whatever you want. If a box of uncrustables makes your life easier and your kid eats them, then go for it.
I wouldn't do it because I think they're a total waste of money and my kid wouldn't touch them. And I am not the health food police at all (My kid gets her share of box stuff I promise).
And like the pp..opening the package isn't any easier than making a PBJ.
As someone who works in a school and gets her share of lunch duty, I wouldn't side eye and uncrustable as long as it was packed with some other healthy stuff.
Lunchables get side eyed by the staff because all kids want is the fake juice juice box and the treat. The meat is gross to kids, the cheese is slimy by lunch so they don't want it and the crush the crackers everywhere. Kids never love them as much as they claim too.
And LOL that Bento boxes are the in thing and some new novel idea. Glorified Lunchable anyone? Ha. I do it too for my own lunch and on the farm but I'm fully aware it's not some new genius theory.
I'm not even the OP and I'm irritated by the smug comments in this thread. "Well, I would never use such a thing." "Oh, I would never feed my child a sugar bomb like that." "My child only eats free range sandwiches made from quinoa, kelp, and the breath of an angel."
OP, clearly there are people who would judge. Thankfully the Lunch Police aren't a real thing so you can send in whatever you want. If a box of uncrustables makes your life easier and your kid eats them, then go for it.
I feel like there is a big difference between free range sandwiches made from quiona and kale and thinking that uncrustables are gross. I dont get why people cant make a traditional PB&J sandwich. It takes less than five minutes and probably is healthier than the uncrustables.
I hate when people judge how people spend their time. Packing a lunch in general takes 5min but how many people rather not bother & buy their kid school lunch daily that costs more & in many cases is less healthy than a home made. I had 3 kids and a colicky baby who didn't sleep...people can shut it about how I spend my time before 7:30am unless they have been in those shoes. Not that I packed uncrustables (because I'm cheap) but people are so ridiculous.
Post by ilikedonuts on Sept 15, 2014 10:15:28 GMT -5
Serously, guys? How is it not easier to grab this out if the freezer? It takes more then half a second to make a freaking sandwich. Some of these comments are hilarious.
My kid eats them when I need to pack a lunch for something and I'm running crazy late.
I'm not even the OP and I'm irritated by the smug comments in this thread. "Well, I would never use such a thing." "Oh, I would never feed my child a sugar bomb like that." "My child only eats free range sandwiches made from quinoa, kelp, and the breath of an angel."
OP, clearly there are people who would judge. Thankfully the Lunch Police aren't a real thing so you can send in whatever you want. If a box of uncrustables makes your life easier and your kid eats them, then go for it.
I feel like there is a big difference between free range sandwiches made from quiona and kale and thinking that uncrustables are gross. I dont get why people cant make a traditional PB&J sandwich. It takes less than five minutes and probably is healthier than the uncrustables.
I see what you mean but I also see what speckledfrog is getting at. It sometimes feel like the posters who jump off the bat with the "I would never...OMG" are the same ones who would never admit to throwing their kids a goldfish cracker on occassion? KWIM? Like they are feeding their kids free range kelp.