nitaw...

[ttt]

Seriously, who is this moron on your FB??? :-|

[Deleted]

You think he has a crush on her? lol

[basilosaurus]

I just saw that. And the moron referenced my beloved SGU! As a guide to logical fallacies. Clearly he never listens to their podcast or he'd never be so stupid. He didn't even reference the fallacy he thinks you failed, probably because the words were too big for him.

[NitaX]

He's my Rich equivalent. He's the H of one of my friends. I don't defriend him considering that his wife and I tend to work on community projects. His wife is a liberal and limits the amount of conversation she has with him on these topics.

Ya'll have fun with him!

[basilosaurus]

Thank you, I would, except any conversation I have with him shows up in my feed and exposes me to family. I really need to pay attention now to the controls that allow my posts to only be seen to certain people. I'm already practically disowned for asking my grandfather not to send me racist emails because "we" christians wouldn't want to be judged the same way by the rest of the world on the basis of one picture/email/political statment.

I implied I was Christian, and he still printed that shit out and brought it to church to complain about me!

[NitaX]

Hey HABS - look at you using "Extra" LMAO.

On the realz, I wish ya'll could see his FB page. I think it goes without saying that he thinks all Muslims are Public Enemy #1. Right now, he considers SPLC to be a Hate Group. Which I find ironic considering that he finds the new Black Panther Party to be a hate group, and SPLC designates the Nation of Islam and the New Black Panther Party as hate groups. I'd point that out to him, but it causes me great joy on the inside when I snicker at him.

[basilosaurus]

How in the world is SPLC a hate group? I just don't get that. I can see disagreeing, like the anti-gay fundies, but it in and of itself is not a hate group.

[NitaX]

Aug 9, 2012 7:14:07 GMT -5 basilosaurus said:

How in the world is SPLC a hate group? I just don't get that. I can see disagreeing, like the anti-gay fundies, but it in and of itself is not a hate group.

It matters not Sibil. Anything that doesn't adhere to his Free Republic standards is a Hate Group. HTH! YWIA!

And seriously, I don't understand how that is the case. I know we dispute web pages for bias, but I don't think anyone here would find that SPLC was biased and not a credible source.

[teflep]

I am guessing then Occupy Issue, for one:

www.nationalreview.com/corner/299011/occupy-wall-street-and-southern-poverty-law-center-charles-c-w-cooke#

www.theblaze.com/stories/not-really-set-up-to-cover-the-extreme-left-southern-poverty-law-center-explains-why-it-doesnt-track-occupy-as-a-hate-group/

[teflep]

Sorry, that they have bias, not that they are a hate group. Must clarify.

[basilosaurus]

Freepers for the (nonbiased) win!

BTW, it's still in the wee sma's here, and I've decided to drink instead of sleep. You all won't mind my antics, will you?

[NitaX]

Tef, but we'd still reference SPLC. It wouldn't turn off the masses of folks on the board like it would if I posted a Free Republic article KWIM?

[basilosaurus]

Or the blaze. Come on, no one references fucking glenn beck anymore, right? I think we can throw the blaze in with the freepers in the category of people I can legitimately ignore.

[teflep]

Aug 9, 2012 8:13:38 GMT -5 basilosaurus said:

Or the blaze. Come on, no one references fucking glenn beck anymore, right? I think we can throw the blaze in with the freepers in the category of people I can legitimately ignore.

The blaze was linking to National Review so I believe that was the gb tie in,

[teflep]

Aug 9, 2012 8:11:29 GMT -5 NitaX said:

Tef, but we'd still reference SPLC. It wouldn't turn off the masses of folks on the board like it would if I posted a Free Republic article KWIM?

Probably, but it may also depend on topics. Just trying to explain where he might have gotten the bias aspect.

[basilosaurus]

Aug 9, 2012 8:41:17 GMT -5 teflep said:

Aug 9, 2012 8:13:38 GMT -5 basilosaurus said:

Or the blaze. Come on, no one references fucking glenn beck anymore, right? I think we can throw the blaze in with the freepers in the category of people I can legitimately ignore.

The blaze was linking to National Review so I believe that was the gb tie in,

As in, a cyclical circle. If glenn beck references freepers, or vice versa, I really should't care about either.

[teflep]

Aug 9, 2012 8:46:13 GMT -5 basilosaurus said:

Aug 9, 2012 8:41:17 GMT -5 teflep said:

The blaze was linking to National Review so I believe that was the gb tie in,

As in, a cyclical circle. If glenn beck references freepers, or vice versa, I really should't care about either.

dude, the original article is National Review which is NOT FREE. Forget the Blaze mention.

[basilosaurus]

Tef, I respect you, but do you really not get the term freepers?

[teflep]

Isn't freepers referring to free papers? If not, then, no, I don't get it and I will crawl back under my rock

[NitaX]

Aug 9, 2012 9:57:47 GMT -5 teflep said:

Isn't freepers referring to free papers? If not, then, no, I don't get it and I will crawl back under my rock

It's the Free Republic people. LOL

Tef, I'mma need you to get out more. LOL

[teflep]

I was looking on urban dictionary and it said rednecks and I think one said GB was one. I was so confused. Apparently, some things are even too conservative for me . And, if it doesn't have education in it at this point, I'm lost. Heads back to my rock...see ya!

[NitaX]

Well, at least you knew how to check Urban Dictionary. *hee hee*

[Deleted]

Nitaw, I knew you'd like that lolol.

[teflep]

I wasn't sure, but i googled first and UD was first return.