I read an article about how it causes cancer or heart defects or something serious. It turned out to be fake but not before the damage was done.
What? You read a fake article and still are concerned even though it wasn't true?
I *think* she's saying that the damage was done with the general public, kinda like how people can't let go of the MMR= autism even though the study was faked.
From the husband regarding quick approvals, obviously not written in stone:
It did have fast approval. A couple of ways to get that, I cant remember the specifics for gardasil. Can usually happen for urgent medical need (could be, prevents cancer), or early termination of clinical trial because there is overwhelming evidence that it works and therefor unethical to continue to dose placebo (maybe for gardasil).
From the husband regarding quick approvals, obviously not written in stone:
It did have fast approval. A couple of ways to get that, I cant remember the specifics for gardasil. Can usually happen for urgent medical need (could be, prevents cancer), or early termination of clinical trial because there is overwhelming evidence that it works and therefor unethical to continue to dose placebo (maybe for gardasil).
Interesting. Thanks.
E will be nine in September so while many of you have a while I have two years. I will give it more time and do more research closer to making my decision, but I know for a fact it won't be an easy one.
Some dumbass on my FB was circulating how Doc McStuffins is working with big pharma. ::head desk::
Please tell me you made that up.
How else will they indoctrinate young children? Gotta start teaching them young to pump themselves full of drugs (to line the pockets of politicians who are in bed with big pharma)
Post by stevenpmorrissey on Jul 15, 2015 1:02:30 GMT -5
Imma be honest here: I'm a wee bit wary about Gardasil. But also my knowledge about it isn't very full, I think. Just to be clear, I do not believe Gardasil is about population control. Didn't Japan remove it from their vax schedule? Also, I thought I had read that there was some questionable issues during the trials? How they tested it or maybe the info they withheld? Anyone know about this?
I should probably look all this up and fact check, but I'm tired and need my daily fix of the Daily Mail gossip before I fall asleep.