This kind of makes me sad. I don't mean to offend, but there are SO many posters here saying they would adopt or foster if they had $20mil. I'm sad so many people only consider that if they have significant money. And that it appears most want to foster/adopt only after they have biological.
Well to be fair I've already been pregnant twice and I'm going to be 40 soon. So while I'd love to have more kids I don't want to go through another AMA pregnancy. I already have biological so it's kind of hard for me to imagine a circumstance where I don't have my kid(s), kwim? I imagine a lot of posters feel the same way. It's about changing the number of kids they ALREADY have. And most of posters have bio kids.
We have one now, and given our current (non $20M situation), we are considering a second. If we had $20M, I would have 4 total, probably adopting the next three. I don't enjoy pregnancy, I have always wanted to adopt but it was too cost prohibitive. Someone to do all the grocery shopping, cleaning, cooking, prepping food, etc, would be so awesome. And as they get older and have to be in different places, a driver or two.
We'd move closer to family and DH would probably work part time, so more help from him would help. I would probably space them 3ish years apart, because all the travel we currently plan to do once kids are out of the house could either be done with them, or with them home with the nanny.