11 Reasons Akin Didn't Quit

[mominatrix]

TUESDAY, AUG 21, 2012 10:33 AM PDT
Eleven reasons Akin didn’t quit
It's after 6 p.m., and Todd Akin is still on the Missouri ballot. Why did he remain in the race?
BY JEFFREY SMITH
N


Todd Akin declared Tuesday that he would not drop out of the U.S. Senate race in Missouri. Most East Coast journalists and politicos I’ve spoken with cannot fathom how Todd Akin could possibly remain a candidate. As a former Missouri politician who knows Akin, perhaps I can shed some light. Here are 11 reasons why he didn’t quit:

1. He’s 65 and it’s his last shot.

Often, party leaders will ease younger candidates out of races with promises of support for some future nomination. That won’t work with someone who gave up his House seat to run and who clearly doesn’t have a political future if he bows out.

2. His opponent, Claire McCaskill, hasn’t polled over 45 percent for 18 months.

This nomination is worth something when you have an incumbent who, when paired against just about anyone, has hovered in the low 40s since last spring. Most political scientists and operatives assume that most of the time, late-breaking undecided voters favor the challenger approximately 2-to-1, so any challenger appears to be in good shape.

3. He’s never been a deal-cutting legislator.

A leopard doesn’t change his spots. Akin has always been a true believer, and not a typical pragmatic pol, so it’s not in his character to cut a deal now.

4. His base is sticking.

Since he first got into politics, Akin has been a crusader for social conservative causes. Whether it was in support of home schooling or against abortion and gambling, Akin has not given an inch. And so the folks he stood up for are sticking with him, and for that matter, so is Mike Huckabee, whose support was critical in the primary.

5. He’s always been outspent.

The national party’s vow to withdraw financial support doesn’t bother him as much as it would most pols, since he’s been outspent in his two major primaries. As he has said, God has always pulled him through.

6. The establishment has never supported him.

In politics and life, you listen to the people you know and trust. Since the Republican establishment in Missouri and in D.C. never supported him, he owes them nothing now.

7. He has all the leverage.

He is the nominee in a state that Republicans must win if they are to take back the Senate. The National Republican Senatorial Committee and Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS are not going to spend hundreds of millions around the country and then leave Missouri on the table out of stubbornness. Akin, an anti-gambling fanatic, should be smart enough to call their bluff.

8. Missourians seem to dislike McCaskill enough to overlook Akin’s idiocy.

An overnight poll by a respected firm taken after saturation coverage of Akin’s plight suggests that this whole affair didn’t change many minds; Akin still leads by a point.

9. The worst is probably over.

If he quits now, he’s a punch line forever; if he sticks, then (based on No. 9) he has a 50 percent chance of being a U.S. senator as well as a punch line.

10. Wounds take time to heal – especially when people pick at them.

John Brunner, a multimillionaire businessman whom Akin defeated in the primary, is positioning himself to step into the void if Akin quits, and some think he’d be a logical choice since he wouldn’t be burdened with fundraising and has no legislative record to defend. But Akin is still smarting from Brunner’s attack mailers in the primary, which compared Akin to Obama. And I suspect he doesn’t appreciate Brunner making his interest known so brazenly – and so soon after Akin’s misstep. The idea that Brunner, whom Akin just vanquished while being outspent approximately 5-to-1, could waltz in to replace him must make him seethe.

11. God told him to run and it may take God to tell him to quit.

Missouri politicians who have in the past tried to negotiate with Akin describe it as sort of like trying to negotiate with Ahmadinejad. He is a zealot, in every sense of the word. As one top Republican said this morning, “It’s hard to reason with an idiot.” Or maybe, it’s just hard to use worldly logic on someone who is divinely inspired.


www.salon.com/writer/jeffrey_smith/

[Deleted]

UGH. Especially this one:

8. Missourians seem to dislike McCaskill enough to overlook Akin’s idiocy.

An overnight poll by a respected firm taken after saturation coverage of Akin’s plight suggests that this whole affair didn’t change many minds; Akin still leads by a point.

[y4m]

Aug 22, 2012 9:22:55 GMT -5 @lauriergirl28 said:

UGH. Especially this one:

8. Missourians seem to dislike McCaskill enough to overlook Akin’s idiocy.

An overnight poll by a respected firm taken after saturation coverage of Akin’s plight suggests that this whole affair didn’t change many minds; Akin still leads by a point.

The poll you are referring to is crap--don't put too much stock in it. They overwhelmed the sample with Republicans to make it look like a closer race than it actually is--going from an average sample that was +2 Democrat in their past MO polls to +9 Republican for this poll. I usually respect PPP's polls, even though it's a Dem leaning firm, but this one was pretty irresponsible.

[Deleted]

#7 is what keeps going through my head. Are the Republicans actually going to pull all funding? (the RNC said it would, right?) I can't really imagine them just throwing their hands up in the air and walking away from such a critical race.

[OscarQ]

Mrsbecky - my guess is they just funnel the money through a different PAC. That way they can say they didn't support him while still making a real effort to claim the seat.

[y4m]

Aug 22, 2012 9:34:19 GMT -5 @mrsbecky07 said:

#7 is what keeps going through my head. Are the Republicans actually going to pull all funding? (the RNC said it would, right?) I can't really imagine them just throwing their hands up in the air and walking away from such a critical race.

I absolutely do not think the RSCC and the outside groups are bluffing with pulling funding. They don't think the race is winnable with him, no matter how much they spend. So why spend anything at all? Not to mention that supporting him hurts the rest of the GOP brand by association. If he thinks they'll suddenly get behind him, he's nuts.

[Velvetshady]

Forgot #12: Most Americans have little to no attention span or political memory.

[y4m]

Aug 22, 2012 9:40:49 GMT -5 OscarQ said:

Mrsbecky - my guess is they just funnel the money through a different PAC. That way they can say they didn't support him while still making a real effort to claim the seat.

The campaign finance laws actually make this much harder than it sounds.

[basilosaurus]

3. He’s never been a deal-cutting legislator.

A leopard doesn’t change his spots. Akin has always been a true believer, and not a typical pragmatic pol, so it’s not in his character to cut a deal now.

4. His base is sticking.

Since he first got into politics, Akin has been a crusader for social conservative causes. Whether it was in support of home schooling or against abortion and gambling, Akin has not given an inch. And so the folks he stood up for are sticking with him, and for that matter, so is Mike Huckabee, whose support was critical in the primary.

I think these are essential. What he's said doesn't actually hurt him with fellow true believers. He was stupid for saying it so crassly, but there's a lot of support for his position. See: all the Rs who tried so hard to get "forcible" as part of the rape definition.

[IIOY]

Not directly on point here, but this came across my Twitter feed today:

"There is a legit legal loophole in MO that would allow Todd Akin to switch ballot slots with his district Congress candidate, Ann Wagner."