s/o photoshop disasters

[fashionx]

Those creepy hands in the Kim K photo reminded me of this article I saw yesterday about Lady Gaga in Vogue.

shine.yahoo.com/fashion/lady-gaga-8217-extreme-photo-retouch-makeover-vogue-180700465.html

Obviously we all know Photoshop is necessary for magazines, but holy wow!

[adlove]

Omg! She looks like a fashion illustration, that is bizarre.

[315bride]

That's not a photo, that's a goddamn cartoon.

Awful.

[315bride]

Did I miss discussion about Kim K? Anyone want to point me in the right direction to study up on what I missed, if so.

[pixy0stix]

I read this the other day. I'm not sure why the even bothered with a photoshoot.

[fashionx]

I think the end image looks kinda cool because I do like fashion illustrations, but they should've just hired an illustrator vs. going through the trouble of a photoshoot if this is what they're going for!

And I think Lady Gaga is very pretty normally, I just don't get WTF happened here.

[fashionx]

Aug 31, 2012 12:12:47 GMT -5 @315bride said:

Did I miss discussion about Kim K? Anyone want to point me in the right direction to study up on what I missed, if so.

It's this post: pandce.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=fb&action=display&thread=52082

The hands are on the left -- not actually on Kim K, but it's definitely a Photoshop fail. lol

[Deleted]

omg. wtf?

[mrssavy42112]

Yeah, I don’t see the big deal about the Lady Gaga cover. To me, it looks like an intentional illustration. Like a caricature. Even if you look at her face & hair. It looks drawn. I don’t think it’s meant to be taken as a photographed image.

[bethaboo]

I love the cover, but it's weird to see the photo side-by-side it.