Fear over beneficiary child changes (NZ)

[Deleted]

www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10833412

Early childhood experts are in shock after a government decision to make education compulsory from the age of 3 for children of welfare beneficiaries.

The decision, announced by Social Development Minister Paula Bennett yesterday, will apply from July to 31,500 children, aged 3 and 4, whose parents are either on sole parent or couple benefits.

Parents will have their benefits halved if they fail to take "all reasonable steps" to keep their children in licensed or certificated early education for at least 15 hours a week from the time they turn 3 until they go to school.

A Cabinet paper estimates that about 2200 beneficiary families might fail the test each year, of which 1300 might fail to comply immediately and have their benefits halved.

Dr Sarah Farquhar of the Child Forum early childhood support network said the decision amounted to "a revolution in our social policy".

"It would be a complete u-turn in New Zealand's tradition of valuing families and the family's role in the child's early learning and care.



"It's basically saying there is a certain proportion of the population who are not capable of providing early childhood education to their children."

The Plunket Society was alarmed at the move.

"Plunket's approach is to always look at legislative changes like this through the eyes of the child," said its general manager of service development Helen Connors.

"I think that undoubtedly having a 50 per cent cut in income is going to have a direct impact on children."

Solo mum can't afford childcare

Auckland solo mum Kyleigh-Jane Portland is being forced to pull her son out of childcare she can't afford.

Ms Portland, 40, pays $54 a week out of her DPB to send son Tuumanako, who has health problems, to the Learning Point in Pt Chevalier for nine hours a week.

In theory she should get a Work and Income subsidy of $35 a week, reducing the net cost to $19, which she could just manage.

But her application missed the deadline because of lost paperwork, so she has had to file for a review.

New obligations

Beneficiary parents must ensure their children:
* Attend early childhood education 15 hours a week from age 3.
* Attend school from age 5 or 6.
* Enrol with a general practitioner.
* Complete Well Child checks.

[epphd]

Is the school free? I am somewhat torn on this - from the standpoint that it, at least on the surface - ensures that the most "at risk" kids benefit from early childhood education, I can kiiiiiind of get behind it. But only if the programs are licensed and certified for providing a high level of care/education and if they are free. In theory it would even free up parents to have the opportunity to work or take classes that they might not be able to otherwise given the constraints of child care.

If it's just "hey you have to pay for some sort of program that may or may not be any good at all so good luck with that"... then fuckthatnoise.

[SallyJ]

And 15 hours a week? That's a lot of hours for a 3/4 yr old, IMO. The preschool we have is only available for 8 hours a week and costs us $600/month for the 2 kids.

[Deleted]

From the article it looks like it will be subsidised, but this would only help if you had a job to pay for that cost? I don't know it sounds confusing and it will be interesting to see how the Kiwis manage it.

"Auckland solo mum Kyleigh-Jane Portland is being forced to pull her son out of childcare she can't afford.

Ms Portland, 40, pays $54 a week out of her DPB to send son Tuumanako, who has health problems, to the Learning Point in Pt Chevalier for nine hours a week.

In theory she should get a Work and Income subsidy of $35 a week, reducing the net cost to $19, which she could just manage."

[Deleted]

I see what epphd is saying - that it probably has good intentions. I'm not sure that I ever agree with stipulations as big as this to receive welfare though.