The right is excited that this will implicate Clinton, and the left is excited that it will implicate Trump. This is a huge deal which will no doubt expose MANY powerful people.
Post by Velar Fricative on Jul 6, 2019 20:54:20 GMT -5
GOOD. Let’s not forget Alex Acosta is now the Secretary of Labor who’s been relatively unscathed compared to the whole shitshow known as the Trump administration. Not anymore, I hope.
Reading all the details again (Miami Herald published a very well-written and rage-inducing series of articles about Epstein a few months ago), I feel so awful for the numerous victims. And I hope any other adult involved pays too.
The right is excited that this will implicate Clinton, and the left is excited that it will implicate Trump. This is a huge deal which will no doubt expose MANY powerful people.
Prince Andrew is allegedly another one who is likely to be implicated.
The right is excited that this will implicate Clinton, and the left is excited that it will implicate Trump. This is a huge deal which will no doubt expose MANY powerful people.
I know. I don’t care. Burn it all down. Everyone involved should pay.
The right is excited that this will implicate Clinton, and the left is excited that it will implicate Trump. This is a huge deal which will no doubt expose MANY powerful people.
I know. I don’t care. Burn it all down. Everyone involved should pay.
The right is excited that this will implicate Clinton, and the left is excited that it will implicate Trump. This is a huge deal which will no doubt expose MANY powerful people.
I know. I don’t care. Burn it all down. Everyone involved should pay.
The right is excited that this will implicate Clinton, and the left is excited that it will implicate Trump. This is a huge deal which will no doubt expose MANY powerful people.
I know. I don’t care. Burn it all down. Everyone involved should pay.
share.memebox.com/x/uKhKaZmemebox referal code for 20% off! DD1 "J" born 3/2003 DD2 "G" born 4/2011 DS is here! "H" born 2/2014 m/c#3 1-13-13 @ 9 weeks m/c#2 11-11-12 @ 5w2d I am an extended breastfeeding, cloth diapering, baby wearing, pro marriage equality, birth control lovin', Catholic mama.
And here's my tin foil hat being on a little too tight, but there were all sorts of articles about how weird it was that a "squeaky clean" rising GOP star of Jon Huntsman suddenly fizzled out, and then got tapped by Trump to be the Ambassador to Russia when he doesn't even speak Russian and arguably hated Trump. Seems mighty like he got buried and silenced re: the Epstein stuff.
I hope he, and everyone else who participated in these rapes and cover-ups, rot in jail.
I admit to being a little confused about the legalities. His non-prosecution agreement (& immunity) from a decade ago was federal, but then a judge ruled that agreement was illegal, but then Trump's DOJ ruled that they'd uphold it anyway, but now he's arrested on federal charges? Are they different charges now? I see that there will be a lot of documents unsealed at tomorrow's hearing.
I hope he, and everyone else who participated in these rapes and cover-ups, rot in jail.
I admit to being a little confused about the legalities. His non-prosecution agreement (& immunity) from a decade ago was federal, but then a judge ruled that agreement was illegal, but then Trump's DOJ ruled that they'd uphold it anyway, but now he's arrested on federal charges? Are they different charges now? I see that there will be a lot of documents unsealed at tomorrow's hearing.
I swear I read the article...
It's not clear, I googled and read several articles including commentary from the Miami Herald reporter who's been covering this for years. Near as I can tell, the initial FBI investigation and subsequent Acosta sweetheart deal was re: 30 women. I THINK there have been new/more women who've come forward (the Herald reporter said her team had identified 60), so my guess was that these are new charges, same crimes, but different victims.
I hope he, and everyone else who participated in these rapes and cover-ups, rot in jail.
I admit to being a little confused about the legalities. His non-prosecution agreement (& immunity) from a decade ago was federal, but then a judge ruled that agreement was illegal, but then Trump's DOJ ruled that they'd uphold it anyway, but now he's arrested on federal charges? Are they different charges now? I see that there will be a lot of documents unsealed at tomorrow's hearing.
I swear I read the article...
It's not clear, I googled and read several articles including commentary from the Miami Herald reporter who's been covering this for years. Near as I can tell, the initial FBI investigation and subsequent Acosta sweetheart deal was re: 30 women. I THINK there have been new/more women who've come forward (the Herald reporter said her team had identified 60), so my guess was that these are new charges, same crimes, but different victims.
From what I understand, the charges are still sealed and we won't know about them until the court hearing tomorrow (at the earliest, I suppose they could continue to be sealed).
I agree that new victims seems like the most likely charge. That said, apparently this came out of the Public Corruption unit. So it could be something else - bribery and kickbacks to keep his crimes under wrap or to secure that deal from the get go. But from what I understand, you can't always infer what the crime is from the unit involved.
This was the unit that nabbed Michael Cohen. So my tinfoil hat is wondering if he gave up some goods on Epstein that he learned from his dealings with Trump.
Post by Velar Fricative on Jul 8, 2019 11:39:28 GMT -5
I looked back because I know Feinstein brought up Epstein during Acosta's confirmation hearing in 2017. I guess everything else was such a shitshow at that point that Acosta was less controversial than everyone else and no one was paying attention (and that goes for me too, I'm not absolving myself here). He was confirmed 60-38, with all Rs present voting to confirm and 8 Ds/I voting to confirm. Most of those Ds are/were from red states, so endangered Ds like McCaskill and Heitkamp. The one that stands out to me above the rest is Menendez from NJ. Maybe I'm reading way too much into this but I know he's shady too so who the fuck knows why he voted to confirm.
Another interesting article. This one is written by a former Vanity Fair reporter, who talks about a story she wrote on Epstein in 2002. Apparently, Graydon Carter removed references to Epstein's sexual proclivities from the story before it went to print.
Also, I didn't know this, but apparently the true source of Epstein's wealth has always been a mystery. Like the Wall Street asset management work doesn't really tell the whole story, but nobody has ever really dug too deeply into it.