There are some cases where you carry the specific gene for certain forms of breast cancer which elevates your odds, I believe. If that were the case, I would seriously consider it.
Post by OHMBLEEGOHHHHH! on Jan 12, 2013 10:12:11 GMT -5
No. At the first sign of breast cancer? Yes.
BUT - I say that with not having a history of breast cancer in my family. Had I watched my mom and grandmother pass away from it, I might be a bit more jumpy.
I will be doing the test for the genes since there are 5 people on my mothers side that have had breast or ovary cancer. If positive I will consider a double mastectomy and hysterectomy.
Post by Norticprincess on Jan 12, 2013 10:20:57 GMT -5
With that history and a positive genetic result - yes. My sister's godmother waited until it showed up. Still had to go through surgery, followed by chemo. She now has to worry about the long term chemo side effects.
“I said, ‘Dad I’m not going to do that. I like the body I have.’ He got serious and said, ‘Well then you’re going to end up dead like your mom.’ “ :-|
One of my dearest friends had a preventative double mastectomy and a hysterectomy. She said the peace of mind was worth it, and she went out and got some rockin' implants. I'd absolutely handle it the same way.
One of my dearest friends had a preventative double mastectomy and a hysterectomy. She said the peace of mind was worth it, and she went out and got some rockin' implants. I'd absolutely handle it the same way.
Post by mamasaurus on Jan 12, 2013 11:24:28 GMT -5
Yes.
Before I knew I had fibrocystic breasts, I was always getting freaked out by lumps and getting mammograms and ultrasounds. I looked into having the girls removed and reconstructed at one point. I don't even have a family history of breast cancer, either. Fake boobs sounds better than dying a slow and painful death.
If I tested positive for the gene, I absolutely would. My mom and my step-mom both had double mastectomies after they were diagnosed and neither of them had reconstruction of any kind, so I have two incredible examples of how boobs are just boobs, and that they don't define who you are as a person or as a woman.
Yup. There's a huge history of breast cancer on my mom's side. I have a 33 year old cousin w/ stage 4 breast cancer. I would absolutely do it if I carried the gene.
When men start to do preemptive testicular removals because their fathers and grandfathers had testicular cancer and we all start calling it brave and courageous then I will consider a preemptive double mastectomy.
When men start to do preemptive testicular removals because their fathers and grandfathers had testicular cancer and we all start calling it brave and courageous then I will consider a preemptive double mastectomy.
I absolutely would do this. I have a history of ovarian cancer and was screened for the BRCA gene (neg, thankfully). My mom and g-grandma both passed away from that type of cancer. If it was positive, I would have had a preventative hysterectomy after children. I realize breasts are different and probably tougher, since there is a physical/appearance/sexual aspect, but after going through the thought process I would do it for sure. Totally rock some implants like GOZF's friend. That's awesome, I hope she is doing well.
When men start to do preemptive testicular removals because their fathers and grandfathers had testicular cancer and we all start calling it brave and courageous then I will consider a preemptive double mastectomy.
Wtf? Our breasts don't emit hormones that essentially make us who we are...
When men start to do preemptive testicular removals because their fathers and grandfathers had testicular cancer and we all start calling it brave and courageous then I will consider a preemptive double mastectomy.
Coming undone...
Having my own opinion that differs from ML=coming undone.
Having my own opinion that differs from ML=coming undone.
LOL.
You know I like you, right? Because I do. I would just never, ever take medical advice from you. When doctors or medical treatments come up, you start sounding a little bonkers.
Having my own opinion that differs from ML=coming undone.
LOL.
Your opinion being no, you wouldn't have the procedure done, is one thing. Mocking the women who have been faced with that decision and chose to do so isn't an opinion, its called being an asshole. That chip on your shoulder must be getting mighty heavy by now.
Yes, I would consider it if I had a high chance of developing breast cancer.
Having my own opinion that differs from ML=coming undone.
LOL.
Your opinion being no, you wouldn't have the procedure done, is one thing. Mocking the women who have been faced with that decision and chose to do so isn't an opinion, its called being an asshole. That chip on your shoulder must be getting mighty heavy by now.
Yes, I would consider it if I had a high chance of developing breast cancer.
I don't consider it mocking the women. I consider it pointing out a discrepancy regarding preemptive surgery and how it is portrayed in the media.
Post by chalupabatman on Jan 12, 2013 12:39:52 GMT -5
If I had the gene, yes. I watched my mom die of breast cancer and would absolutely have a double mastectomy to avoid even the smallest bit of what she went through.
My understanding had been that that particular form of breast cancer is especially aggressive, so waiting until it is detectable can be a big risk.