Rule #1: Don't post shit on the internet that you don't want other people to read.
The wife didn't put it on the internet. The trick ass hot fucking mess did even though the wife asked her not to and not to reveal who she was.
That was the personal information and that's the reason SOrs asked that it be deleted.
Just to clarify the "trick ass hot fucking mess" (who also was a victim in this as well and was honestly very upset by the whole thing) wasn't the one who outed the poster and didn't give out any personal information. Also I'm still not really sure why if the wife was so concerned about this getting out, she didn't use an AE to PM.
"This prick is asking for someone here to bring him to task Somebody give me some dirt on this vacuous mass so we can at last unmask him I'll pull the trigger on it, someone load the gun and cock it While we were all watching, he got Washington in his pocket."
The wife didn't put it on the internet. The trick ass hot fucking mess did even though the wife asked her not to and not to reveal who she was.
That was the personal information and that's the reason SOrs asked that it be deleted.
Just to clarify the "trick ass hot fucking mess" (who also was a victim in this as well and was honestly very upset by the whole thing) wasn't the one who outed the poster and didn't give out any personal information. Also I'm still not really sure why if the wife was so concerned about this getting out, she didn't use an AE to PM.
Dude! she said shit like: I've been fucking her H and she still thinks they can work it out.
You're defending her actions in that post?
If she would have respected that woman's privacy, it would have never been an issue in the first place.
Ew! don't shit all over the place and blame other people for the smell.
Just to clarify the "trick ass hot fucking mess" (who also was a victim in this as well and was honestly very upset by the whole thing) wasn't the one who outed the poster and didn't give out any personal information. Also I'm still not really sure why if the wife was so concerned about this getting out, she didn't use an AE to PM.
Oooohhhhhhh.....poor redvelvet!
And it's still the wife's fault, apparently.
Yes poor redvelvet. She was lied too as well. It sucked for her. I'm sure it sucks harder for the wife, but it doesn't mean it can't suck for rv too. She did the right thing once she found out the truth, she broke up with the guy.
And all I'm saying is the wife doesn't know RV or how she's likely to react. I mean it's an internet stranger for god's sake. If she was really that concerned about being outed, she could have used an AE and no one would have been the wiser.
I think this really stretches the definition of personal info, but our disagreement over what that entails just further emphasizes our need for clarification by voting or something.
Either way, before I reported the thread I asked if there was any objection to the deleting. There was none. I can't recall if I put this in my report however I did PM several mods and stated as such.
You did put it in your report and you guys also had another separate post up about deleting it. I felt totally comfortable deleting it even though I wasn't a SO mod and I don't delete jack.
The wife didn't put it on the internet. The trick ass hot fucking mess did even though the wife asked her not to and not to reveal who she was.
That was the personal information and that's the reason SOrs asked that it be deleted.
Just to clarify the "trick ass hot fucking mess" (who also was a victim in this as well and was honestly very upset by the whole thing) wasn't the one who outed the poster and didn't give out any personal information. Also I'm still not really sure why if the wife was so concerned about this getting out, she didn't use an AE to PM.
No, OP didn't post the SN however I don't think she should have even posted that she was even contacted. I'm sure if the situation was reseversed, she would not want it done to her. It was a PM and that information should have stayed private.
The wife didn't put it on the internet. The trick ass hot fucking mess did even though the wife asked her not to and not to reveal who she was.
That was the personal information and that's the reason SOrs asked that it be deleted.
Just to clarify the "trick ass hot fucking mess" (who also was a victim in this as well and was honestly very upset by the whole thing) wasn't the one who outed the poster and didn't give out any personal information. Also I'm still not really sure why if the wife was so concerned about this getting out, she didn't use an AE to PM.
Deleting due to personal information seems like it should be straightforward, but having had to make decisions about it, it can be complicated and the definitions vary from board to board. Obviously people's real names and employers count, and that's a bright line any mod should be able to respond to on any board. But what about things like old screennames, hints about identity, google terms? What about things that aren't identifiable on their own, but are when combined with other common knowledge on the board that a global mod doesn't necessarily have? I suspect the rules would differ between different boards right now. I also suspect they'd differ within a board depending on how well-liked the poster being targeted is.
If you guys want to take a stab at writing a policy everyone would agree with, that mods can reasonably follow, and that covers most possible circumstances--go for it. If we can really come up with something like that, it would be great, because it could protect both posters and mods.
The wife didn't put it on the internet. The trick ass hot fucking mess did even though the wife asked her not to and not to reveal who she was.
That was the personal information and that's the reason SOrs asked that it be deleted.
Just to clarify the "trick ass hot fucking mess" (who also was a victim in this as well and was honestly very upset by the whole thing) wasn't the one who outed the poster and didn't give out any personal information. Also I'm still not really sure why if the wife was so concerned about this getting out, she didn't use an AE to PM.
Lord, I would love to chronicle all the ways the trick ass fucking mess was a complete and total horbeast in her telling of this tale.
If she really only wanted support, she would have left out that it was a GBCNr and moved it along. Instead, she posted about it, detailed what was going on and left enough information that it was figured out rather quickly.
So... basically everything that I C&Pd and everything that was discussed in my horrible BETRAYAL OF TRUST thread has been recapped here for everyone to read, including screennames (which I left out).
So way to go, guys!
Look - if the wife's parents had never had sex, she would not have been born, and none of this would have happened. I think we can all see who is to blame here.
Just to clarify the "trick ass hot fucking mess" (who also was a victim in this as well and was honestly very upset by the whole thing) wasn't the one who outed the poster and didn't give out any personal information. Also I'm still not really sure why if the wife was so concerned about this getting out, she didn't use an AE to PM.
Are you serious with this?
I am serious about this. The wife didn't know where RV's head was at. All I'm saying is this could have been much worse if RV wasn't being what I think is fairly decent about probably on of the craziest things to happen on this message board.
Deleting due to personal information seems like it should be straightforward, but having had to make decisions about it, it can be complicated and the definitions vary from board to board. Obviously people's real names and employers count, and that's a bright line any mod should be able to respond to on any board. But what about things like old screennames, hints about identity, google terms? What about things that aren't identifiable on their own, but are when combined with other common knowledge on the board that a global mod doesn't necessarily have? I suspect the rules would differ between different boards right now. I also suspect they'd differ within a board depending on how well-liked the poster being targeted is.
If you guys want to take a stab at writing a policy everyone would agree with, that mods can reasonably follow, and that covers most possible circumstances--go for it. If we can really come up with something like that, it would be great, because it could protect both posters and mods.
I'd say there's a better chance of congress agreeing to a financial plan.
Yes poor redvelvet. She was lied too as well. It sucked for her. I'm sure it sucks harder for the wife, but it doesn't mean it can't suck for rv too. She did the right thing once she found out the truth, she broke up with the guy.
And all I'm saying is the wife doesn't know RV or how she's likely to react. I mean it's an internet stranger for god's sake. If she was really that concerned about being outed, she could have used an AE and no one would have been the wiser.
That's bullshit. Total bullshit. If we should feel oh so sad for RV, why did she post AFTER the wife PM'd her? Why did she continue to claim the wife was crazy and make inflammatory comments about sleeping with her H, AFTER the wife PM'd her? That's doing the right thing?
I have absolutely no sympathy for RV's actions once she received that PM.
"This prick is asking for someone here to bring him to task Somebody give me some dirt on this vacuous mass so we can at last unmask him I'll pull the trigger on it, someone load the gun and cock it While we were all watching, he got Washington in his pocket."
Post by lyssbobiss, Command, B613 on Feb 11, 2013 15:16:57 GMT -5
Guys, seriously? Can we stop naming anyone? I still think what happened was shitty, and naming here doesn't really make us any higher above the fray. I didn't want to name specific posters.
"This prick is asking for someone here to bring him to task Somebody give me some dirt on this vacuous mass so we can at last unmask him I'll pull the trigger on it, someone load the gun and cock it While we were all watching, he got Washington in his pocket."
Since power grabbing and overreaching is common here, please note I have appointed myself as Chief Justice of the GBCN Tribunal of Justice. Our first ruling is as follows:
Post by lyssbobiss, Command, B613 on Feb 11, 2013 15:18:59 GMT -5
But she isn't the one who came over here and posted shit on our board. If we are unhappy that personal info may or may not have been included in the C&P, I think it stands to reason we should be uncool with naming any involved parties over here too.
"This prick is asking for someone here to bring him to task Somebody give me some dirt on this vacuous mass so we can at last unmask him I'll pull the trigger on it, someone load the gun and cock it While we were all watching, he got Washington in his pocket."
So the issue at hand is what sort of ethical stance do you want moderators to take? I think most of us are pretty clear on what needs to be deleted. However we seem to have *ahem* differing views on what to do with the information we can see on which threads are reported.
Post by lyssbobiss, Command, B613 on Feb 11, 2013 15:24:45 GMT -5
All I know is, within the damn thread, people were calling for mods to come and delete, and begging for posters to come back and remove how to search for one of the parties involved. In that case, a mod should have deleted the thread. And if not, you don't copy and fucking paste parts of it to another board. Unless you're only reading little snippets of a thread, which I doubt, you are well aware that there is a scurry to get shit deleted.
"This prick is asking for someone here to bring him to task Somebody give me some dirt on this vacuous mass so we can at last unmask him I'll pull the trigger on it, someone load the gun and cock it While we were all watching, he got Washington in his pocket."
So the issue at hand is what sort of ethical stance do you want moderators to take? I think most of us are pretty clear on what needs to be deleted. However we seem to have *ahem* differing views on what to do with the information we can see on which threads are reported.
Let's go with the idea that cjoy genuinely came across the SO post all by her little lonesome and with no help from her mod powers. At some point, it's clear that she was aware that it had been reported with the assistance of her mod hat. Doesn't it stand to reason that she should have deleted the ML thread?
All I know is, within the damn thread, people were calling for mods to come and delete, and begging for posters to come back and remove how to search for one of the parties involved. In that case, a mod should have deleted the thread. And if not, you don't copy and fucking paste parts of it to another board. Unless you're only reading little snippets of a thread, which I doubt, you are well aware that there is a scurry to get shit deleted.
So the issue at hand is what sort of ethical stance do you want moderators to take? I think most of us are pretty clear on what needs to be deleted. However we seem to have *ahem* differing views on what to do with the information we can see on which threads are reported.
Let's go with the idea that cjoy genuinely came across the SO post all by her little lonesome and with no help from her mod powers. At some point, it's clear that she was aware that it had been reported with the assistance of her mod hat. Doesn't it stand to reason that she should have deleted the ML thread?
Is that really such a novel concept?
There were also posts within the thread that stated it we were trying to get it deleted.