House Pushes Back On Gay Rights

[EllieArroway]

As Obama backs gay marriage, House GOP tries to limit gay-friendly policies

By Ed O'Keefe

On the same day President Obama became the first president to fully embrace same-sex marriage, House Republicans once again approved measures that limit Obama administration policy decisions and federal policies favorable to gays and lesbians.

House Republicans voted Wednesday night to bar the Justice Department from using any federal funds to oppose the Defense of Marriage Act. They added the prohibitions to an appropriations measure. The Obama administration last year said it would no longer defend the federal law that bans the recognition of same-sex marriage because it considers the legislation unconstitutional.

Also Wednesday night, the House Armed Services Committee voted to bar gay and lesbian service members from getting married or holding “marriage-like” ceremonies at military facilities.

Both measures, or similar bills, have been introduced or successfully added to appropriations and authorization measures in recent years, but the proposals are often dropped as part of negotiations over a final version of the bill with Senate Democrats

Regardless, the symbolism of the GOP attempting to roll back gay rights on the same day that the president endorsed same-sex marriage wasn’t lost on some.

“On an historic day and in the dark of night, House Republicans have voted to tie the hands of the Obama Administration with respect to their efforts to end discrimination against America’s families,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in response to the Justice Department measure.

The amendment, introduced by Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.), passed late Wednesday, 245 to 171. Huelskamp said he introduced the amendment because “President Obama and the entire Executive Branch are supposed to enforce the laws, not write or erase them. It is not President Obama’s prerogative to decide which laws matter and which do not, nor his right to challenge constitutional amendments duly passed by the various States.”

Over at the armed services panel, Reps. Steve Palazzo (R-Miss.) and Todd Akin (R-Mo.) successfully amended the defense measure Wednesday night to include restrictions on gay marriage.

Akin said that since last fall’s repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy barring gays and lesbians from serving openly in uniform, “we have heard stories of military chaplains facing censorship for their opposition to the liberal agenda. Chaplains and service members should not face recrimination or persecution in the military for standing strong on their religious beliefs in opposition to homosexuality.”

But Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the panel’s ranking Democrat, said he opposed the measure, because despite the repeal of DADT, “members of this committee are looking to turn back the clock and find new ways to discriminate against gay and lesbian service members.”

The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which pushed for the repeal of DADT, noted late Wednesday that the Pentagon “has already made it clear - and appropriately so - that decisions about the use of facilities should be made on a sexual orientation neutral basis.”

[UMaineTeach]

I thought that military chaplains were supposed to be religion neutral in a professional setting?

They are supposed to be able to counsel people of all faiths, without implying that a particular faith is correct, right?

[redheadbaker]

That's just out-and-out hateful.

[secretlyevil]

the house sucks, that is all.

[charminglife]

What a waste of time.

[dev22]

May 10, 2012 15:07:59 GMT -5 redheadbaker said:

That's just out-and-out hateful.

Yup. There is absolutely no reason for them to add those provisions on to an appropriations bill except to say"fuck you" to the GLBT community.

[emilyj]

May 10, 2012 16:44:31 GMT -5 charminglife said:

What a waste of time.

I know. I am SO glad to know that the economy is stable, the unemployment rate is almost down to 0, the budget is completely balanced, foreign policy is in check, we have a solid plan for our troops, we have made headway on new energy solutions to reduce our dependency on oil...

Wait, what's that? None of the above? Then what the fuck??