PG/Mom Check In

[aegis2005]

Is there any interest in having a weekly check in again? I've noticed a few people mentioning it over the past few weeks. So, if there's interest, I'll start posting it again, because it seemed to have died ... and that was never my intention.

That said, the list I have is 4+ months old, I know some of the newest additions aren't on the list I have stored on my computer, so I'd need some help filling in the blanks.

Let me know what you think ...

[jennifer8080]

It was a fun way to keep up with everyone, but I can understand if it's too much for you to deal with updating the list all the time, etc. What if we just started a post every Monday and everyone who wants to take part can post their updates? I don't mind starting a post every week, but I know I can't keep up with the list, especially since I always post from my iPad now. And honestly, the list was getting insanely long and it seems like we lost a lot of people in the transition anyway. But thats just my $.02.

[alzi]

I like reading this even though I can't contribute yet.

[mrsjenrn]

If it's easier, we could always start our posts with our child's name/age rather than have to worry about keeping a list, and then whoever thinks about it first can start the check in on Monday.

[tashaandsage]

I'd like to see the return of the check in. It was nice to have one place where everyone can share kid-related stuff. I do think i agree with Jennifer that the list isn't necessarily important.

[sara76]

See I liked the list. It helped with due dates when people didn't have tickers, and to remember what team they were on. List of parents not such a big deal but when I was new it was a good reference point. But I do agree w Jennifer that a good majority of ladies didn't make the move over so that long list isn't necessary. Maybe we can just start a check in with no list and when we post we can put that info like JenRN said Then in a few weeks start a new list of GBCNers to include if we decide to go that way.

[jen812]

Sounds good to me.

[tashaandsage]

I posted before I saw JenRN's. I like her idea of having the child's info within each reply post. I never would read and cross referance the list, unless as Sara said, it was for the due dates and genders foe the expectant moms. Maybe keep the pregnant ladies but skip the long list of moms?

[jennifer8080]

I'm totally good with posting child's info. And I'm good with the idea of re-creating the list of pregnant ladies based on who participates.

[mrsjenrn]

Jun 20, 2012 13:28:21 GMT -5 jennifer8080 said:

I'm totally good with posting child's info. And I'm good with the idea of re-creating the list of pregnant ladies based on who participates.

Sounds good to me!

[moonstone523]

Let's do it, to it.