I have no fashion sense. Are jelly purses still cute?

[Deleted]

Specifically, this one right here:
Jelly purse.


Edit: I wouldn't pay $300 dollars for any purse. Maybe like... $100 max. I just think this is neat. 

[Deleted]

Was that ever cute?

[Booze Raccoon]

Where they once cute?

[zoidberg]

I would not want everyone to see my purse mess and tampons.

[koopa17]

Yikes...maybe for a 4 year old? Sorry.

[Booze Raccoon]

JINX!

[snipsnsnails]

Ha, I mean this in the nicest way possible, but are we being punk'd? That purse is tragic.

[demelza]

$375 for plastic?

[bonquiqui]

Not a fan and lol at the responses

[CheshireGrin]

I thought it was kind of cute until I looked at the price. HOLY SHIT. I would pay like fifteen bucks for that and use it when I was feeling silly.

[underwaterrhymes]

Does that really say $375?

[jane6672]

I wouldn't want everyone to see the innards of my purse.

[cutecloud]

Holy Moses. Is that a $375 plastic vinyl purse?

[Deleted]

I'm not a fan. Also, I couldn't handle everyone being able to see the contents of my purse.

[Deleted]

 I actually do like this purse. However, I fully admit I have absolutely zero fashion sense. They were in when I worked at Nordstroms a years ago, so I just assumed they were still sort of cool, at least.

[hisno1girl]

Three hundred and seventy five fucking dollars?

:0

I can't get past the price.

IT'S NOT EVEN LEATHAH!!

[eb777888]

Ewwwwww. No.

Or "ohhh, honey..." HRH Queen Dick I, Orphan

[eb777888]

Sept 29, 2013 20:30:30 GMT -5 hisno1girl said:

Three hundred and seventy five fucking dollars?

:0

I can't get past the price.

IT'S NOT EVEN LEATHAH!!

Or cute! 

I wouldn't take it for free, lol.

[CheshireGrin]

Sept 29, 2013 20:27:37 GMT -5 zoidberg said:

I would not want everyone to see my purse mess and tampons.

This is a very good point as well. To the extent that it is ever cute, it is certainly only cute when it is empty.

[jaycee]

Nope Nope Nope

[Deleted]

Listen. I'm about the LEAST fashionable person on the planet. I mean, I just finally bought nude pumps.


That purse is....not cool. Coming from me.

[Booze Raccoon]

Sept 29, 2013 20:30:04 GMT -5 @birdbird said:

 I actually do like this purse. However, I fully admit I have absolutely zero fashion sense. They were in when I worked at Nordstroms a years ago, so I just assumed they were still sort of cool, at least.

These were the ones they gave you to use during work so they could see you weren't stealing anything?

[Deleted]

LOL.

[Deleted]

Sept 29, 2013 20:45:32 GMT -5 Booze Raccoon said:

Sept 29, 2013 20:30:04 GMT -5 @birdbird said:

 I actually do like this purse. However, I fully admit I have absolutely zero fashion sense. They were in when I worked at Nordstroms a years ago, so I just assumed they were still sort of cool, at least.

These were the ones they gave you to use during work so they could see you weren't stealing anything?

I know you are being facetious, but no. Actually, I believe they were Kate Spade or something like that. $500 to 2k.

[MrsAxilla]

Sept 29, 2013 20:48:36 GMT -5 @birdbird said:

Sept 29, 2013 20:45:32 GMT -5 Booze Raccoon said:

These were the ones they gave you to use during work so they could see you weren't stealing anything?

I know you are being facetious, but no. Actually, I believe they were Kate Spade or something like that. $500 to 2k.

I remember those.  I think they were Kate Spade and they were tragic as well.  I also think they were opaque plastic

[Booze Raccoon]

Sept 29, 2013 20:48:36 GMT -5 @birdbird said:

Sept 29, 2013 20:45:32 GMT -5 Booze Raccoon said:

These were the ones they gave you to use during work so they could see you weren't stealing anything?

I know you are being facetious, but no. Actually, I believe they were Kate Spade or something like that. $500 to 2k.

Like this?  

[eb777888]

Sept 29, 2013 20:48:36 GMT -5 @birdbird said:

Sept 29, 2013 20:45:32 GMT -5 Booze Raccoon said:

These were the ones they gave you to use during work so they could see you weren't stealing anything?

I know you are being facetious, but no. Actually, I believe they were Kate Spade or something like that. $500 to 2k.

No, I had to carry a very similar one when I worked in retail. They wanted to make sure we weren't stealing product. They gave them to us for free, though.

[mansplain]

No, and I cannot fathom spending over $300 on some plastic bag so people can see my tampons and other items.

[Deleted]

Sept 29, 2013 20:56:35 GMT -5 eb777888 said:

Sept 29, 2013 20:48:36 GMT -5 @birdbird said:

I know you are being facetious, but no. Actually, I believe they were Kate Spade or something like that. $500 to 2k.

No, I had to carry a very similar one when I worked in retail. They wanted to make sure we weren't stealing product. They gave them to us for free, though.

They didn't make us have a certain type of purse. We simply left them all in one communal coat/purse area watched by security. No free purse. 

[Deleted]

Sept 29, 2013 20:54:47 GMT -5 Booze Raccoon said:

Sept 29, 2013 20:48:36 GMT -5 @birdbird said:

I know you are being facetious, but no. Actually, I believe they were Kate Spade or something like that. $500 to 2k.

Like this?  

No, but they had those, too. No, I'm looking online and it seems that Furla is the only maker of that style of purse that Nordstrom seems to carry. So, it must be Furla?