They also said they weren't responsible for killing all those civilians at the UN school before being forced to admit that yes, they did kill all those civilians at the UN school. So I'm not too inclined to trust what the IDF says at the moment.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing.
No, I know, it wasn't directed at you! Just responding to the article.
It was a bit snarky, yes, but FWIW there are 5 pages of serious discussion with sources cited and pretty amicable until people decided to blow off steam about such a heated discussion by making jokes, which I don't have a problem with.
If she (who is too fragile to be tagged) wanted to engage in a serious matter, she could have bothered to read the previous discussions and citations. You can't really come in, guns blazing, claiming crazy stuff with no sources, and then when people disagree with you, say, "Stop yelling at me! I'm sensitive!" particularly if the regs on here don't know you from Adam.
She is welcome to come back and engage for real if she wants to.
She disagrees with you all. For that, she deserves to be insulted. She's in a tough place emotionally right now, and for that she deserves eyerolls and yet more flaming because her ability to shake off insults is diminished right now. Got it.
The five year old comment was really out of line, and she is not the problem in this thread for not being able to just shake that off. She deserves an apology.
It was a bit snarky, yes, but FWIW there are 5 pages of serious discussion with sources cited and pretty amicable until people decided to blow off steam about such a heated discussion by making jokes, which I don't have a problem with.
If she (who is too fragile to be tagged) wanted to engage in a serious matter, she could have bothered to read the previous discussions and citations. You can't really come in, guns blazing, claiming crazy stuff with no sources, and then when people disagree with you, say, "Stop yelling at me! I'm sensitive!" particularly if the regs on here don't know you from Adam.
She is welcome to come back and engage for real if she wants to.
She disagrees with you all. For that, she deserves to be insulted. She's in a tough place emotionally right now, and for that she deserves eyerolls and yet more flaming because her ability to shake off insults is diminished right now. Got it.
The five year old comment was really out of line, and she is not the problem in this thread for not being able to just shake that off. She deserves an apology.
Now hold up missy.
Do you even know the context of the "like I'm 5" comment? Do you?!
It was a bit snarky, yes, but FWIW there are 5 pages of serious discussion with sources cited and pretty amicable until people decided to blow off steam about such a heated discussion by making jokes, which I don't have a problem with.
If she (who is too fragile to be tagged) wanted to engage in a serious matter, she could have bothered to read the previous discussions and citations. You can't really come in, guns blazing, claiming crazy stuff with no sources, and then when people disagree with you, say, "Stop yelling at me! I'm sensitive!" particularly if the regs on here don't know you from Adam.
She is welcome to come back and engage for real if she wants to.
She disagrees with you all. For that, she deserves to be insulted. She's in a tough place emotionally right now, and for that she deserves eyerolls and yet more flaming because her ability to shake off insults is diminished right now. Got it.
The five year old comment was really out of line, and she is not the problem in this thread for not being able to just shake that off. She deserves an apology.
Lots of us disagree with each other in this thread. But nobody else has started spouting completely inaccurate, unsubstantiated "facts" and conspiracy theories, and then gotten upset when called out on it.
It was a bit snarky, yes, but FWIW there are 5 pages of serious discussion with sources cited and pretty amicable until people decided to blow off steam about such a heated discussion by making jokes, which I don't have a problem with.
If she (who is too fragile to be tagged) wanted to engage in a serious matter, she could have bothered to read the previous discussions and citations. You can't really come in, guns blazing, claiming crazy stuff with no sources, and then when people disagree with you, say, "Stop yelling at me! I'm sensitive!" particularly if the regs on here don't know you from Adam.
She is welcome to come back and engage for real if she wants to.
She disagrees with you all. For that, she deserves to be insulted. She's in a tough place emotionally right now, and for that she deserves eyerolls and yet more flaming because her ability to shake off insults is diminished right now. Got it.
The five year old comment was really out of line, and she is not the problem in this thread for not being able to just shake that off. She deserves an apology.
Huh? This isn't school or work? No one is required to be here. Did you yourself even read the first pages of this thread.
Outside of her being tagged (that pushes someone to open a thread if they think they're being addressed) all else is fair game. This isnt new.
Wait.
Are you saying she deserves an apology for being tagged? Because that's one I haven't heard yet.
Does that go the same for quoting? Because that's the same effect as tagging.
In my mind it is more rude to talk behind someone's back and tagging or quoting alerts them to the fact that they or their opinions are being discussed.
Outside of her being tagged (that pushes someone to open a thread if they think they're being addressed) all else is fair game. This isnt new.
Wait.
Are you saying she deserves an apology for being tagged? Because that's one I haven't heard yet.
Does that go the same for quoting? Because that's the same effect as tagging.
In my mind it is more rude to talk behind someone's back and tagging or quoting alerts them to the fact that they or their opinions are being discussed.
Are you saying she deserves an apology for being tagged? Because that's one I haven't heard yet.
Does that go the same for quoting? Because that's the same effect as tagging.
In my mind it is more rude to talk behind someone's back and tagging or quoting alerts them to the fact that they or their opinions are being discussed.
Outside of her being tagged (that pushes someone to open a thread if they think they're being addressed) all else is fair game. This isnt new.
Wait.
Are you saying she deserves an apology for being tagged? Because that's one I haven't heard yet.
Does that go the same for quoting? Because that's the same effect as tagging.
In my mind it is more rude to talk behind someone's back and tagging or quoting alerts them to the fact that they or their opinions are being discussed.
no. you, or someone as I don't give a shit, said she didn't have to read a trigger thread, but once you tag them (as in actually tag them, not just saying their name like heynude, but with the @ symbol) they get an alert. So, it is like putting a frosted cupcake in front of someone and saying, "no, don't touch".
Are you saying she deserves an apology for being tagged? Because that's one I haven't heard yet.
Does that go the same for quoting? Because that's the same effect as tagging.
In my mind it is more rude to talk behind someone's back and tagging or quoting alerts them to the fact that they or their opinions are being discussed.
Post by NewOrleans on Jul 28, 2014 20:16:52 GMT -5
I don't know wtf sparky is doing, but I do want to say that emsumm actually is in a very bad way right now and was probably looking for a distraction, not a fight.* I can also guarantee that she gives not a single shit about apologies at this moment.
*unfortunately, the topic is really loaded on this board and in her own life and therefore does not serve as a good distraction but one more thing to feel shitty about