Did anyone look at the national option? Allegedly, the deficient would decrease about $2B under Obama and INCREASE $5B under Romney. Have to pay for those tax cuts somehow, eh?
It seems that the personal measurement is based on how much you make, and Romney benefits you if you're rich. I can't figure out the local measurement though. In my state it seemed to have less to do with rich areas being benefitted by Romney (although that played out a little) and possibly more to do with areas that are typically Republican anyway?
Oh, or possibly areas that are more rural?
the website has a whole section on their methodology & in it they state they said they focused on financial plans.
Yeah, I don't see how they can be so different that one candidate favors one village of a town while all th other villages are helped by the other candidate - when mind you, there's nothing financially different between them. Very weird.