Post by tacosforlife on Dec 24, 2015 8:52:43 GMT -5
So I have not seen the cartoon and am not a fan of making fun of children of candidates.
I am curious what people think about this statement:
A post originally published with the cartoon explained Ms. Telnaes’s intention: “When a politician uses his children as political props, as Ted Cruz recently did in his Christmas parody video in which his eldest daughter read (with her father’s dramatic flourish) a passage of an edited Christmas classic, then I figure they are fair game,” she wrote.
I saw the cartoon and I don't care. There was no likeness to his daughters and all it made was the point that he uses them like dancing monkeys for his campaign, which is true.
So, meh. I don't like politicians using their kids like he does, and I think it's accurate commentary.
I absolutely don't agree with depicting the kids in any cartoon. Kids are off-limits. Depicting them as monkeys is even more heinous. Depicting any person as a monkey is just too far from proper.
However, if the artist depicted him reading to two little girls that may or may not be his kids, as they cower under the covers with just eyes peeking out as he's reading "How Obamacare Stole Christmas" (which is what he was reading to them in the ad) or "Rudolph the Underemployed Reindeer" (apparently another of his politically incorrect parodies he's used) then I don't have a problem with the depiction or the message.
That's disgusting. I don't agree with him using his children in his ad either but that's his decision to make as their father. And as my mom used to always say when I was a kid... Two wrongs don't make a right
So I have not seen the cartoon and am not a fan of making fun of children of candidates.
I am curious what people think about this statement:
A post originally published with the cartoon explained Ms. Telnaes’s intention: “When a politician uses his children as political props, as Ted Cruz recently did in his Christmas parody video in which his eldest daughter read (with her father’s dramatic flourish) a passage of an edited Christmas classic, then I figure they are fair game,” she wrote.
I think she's a disgusting POS. People will tell themselves anything to justify their fuckery. How does their father using them in an ad--something over which they likely had no say--make them acceptable targets? Why would anyone want to use someone's children as "fair game?" She needs to evaluate her life, seriously.
And I can't stand Ted Cruz, but right is right and wrong is wrong every hour of the day.
Like every politician trots their kids around at some point. I disagree that he was doing something more than anyone else.
I would not have guessed from that cartoon that the monkeys were referring to the kids. I feel like if you have to explain and then clarify your cartoon joke, you should reconsider your line of work. That's not even including your making fun of children AND making fun of them by depicting then as monkeys.
"Hello babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. On the outside, babies, you've got a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies-"God damn it, you've got to be kind.”