They're predicting a 9.4% chance that HRC wins the popular vote but loses the election. WTF. We don't need a repeat of the 2000 election with an even WORSE GOP candidate.
That's confusing. If you scroll down to the winding snake like graphic, Clinton still currently has more than 270 electoral votes. So how does that put Trump as more likely to win?
I'm really confused. When I click on the page, it shows Clinton 51 v Trump 48. But once it fully loads, it's 54 trump v 4something for HRC. But now I can't get the page to load past the first 51 v 48. Maybe it really is a glitch?
I'm really confused. When I click on the page, it shows Clinton 51 v Trump 48. But once it fully loads, it's 54 trump v 4something for HRC. But now I can't get the page to load past the first 51 v 48. Maybe it really is a glitch?
Is it first showing the default (Polls Only), then switching to Now Cast (if you clicked through the link here)? You can toggle them in the separate menu near the upper left of the non-mobile site.
It's all going to come down to getting out the vote and having people actually show up. In some ways I'm glad it's close, if it looked like Hillary was running away with it, people might not bother at the last minute. Stay hungry, stay focused, and vote.
My default setting is optimism so I am going to interpret this as a wake-up call to Stein and Johnson voters to give up the ship and get on board with HRC. It was cute to be all "Jill Stein 2016!" when HRC was up by 10. Not cute anymore.
Dems do better when voter turnout is high. They're often incredibly lazy and inconsistent when the outcome looks to be in the bag so despite how stupid it might make me, I do have hopes that people will show up this time.