Based on the crazy found in that article (and warning, it does spoil that book) - should we proceed with reading "The Woman in the Window" for book club in April or should we switch it up? I've added a poll, it closes at midnight on Friday.
As an FYI only: Our original poll for this category can be found here Our book club picks for this year are listed here
I’m fine either way. He did write the book and while he apparently behaves in a truly bizarre way and get away with it it doesn’t seem like any trickery went into getting the book deal. I can see not wanting to give him royalties if you were planning on buying the book though.
Hhmmmm........ I’m fine with either .... they’re both on my to-read list, and both look good. There There looks pretty compelling, especially in light of the cuckoo news about this other guy!
I’m fine either way. He did write the book and while he apparently behaves in a truly bizarre way and get away with it it doesn’t seem like any trickery went into getting the book deal. I can see not wanting to give him royalties if you were planning on buying the book though.
Anyway I voted
The article did also say that it seemed like he ripped the idea for the book off of a movie:
"An American woman in mid-career, a psychologist with a Ph.D. and professional experience of psychopathy, is trapped in her large home by agoraphobia. She has been there for about a year, after a personal trauma. If she tries to go outside, the world spins. She drinks too much, and recklessly combines alcohol and anti-anxiety medication. Police officers distrust her judgment. Online, she plays chess and contributes to a forum for stress-sufferers, a place where danger lies.
This is the setup for “Copycat,” a spirited 1995 thriller, set in San Francisco, starring Sigourney Weaver and Holly Hunter. It also describes “The Woman in the Window.” In “Copycat,” the psychologist’s forum log-in is She Doc. In “Window,” it’s THEDOCTORISIN."
That kind of put me off too. But I'm leaving it up to the board to decide either way
I’m fine either way. He did write the book and while he apparently behaves in a truly bizarre way and get away with it it doesn’t seem like any trickery went into getting the book deal. I can see not wanting to give him royalties if you were planning on buying the book though.
Anyway I voted
The article did also say that it seemed like he ripped the idea for the book off of a movie:
"An American woman in mid-career, a psychologist with a Ph.D. and professional experience of psychopathy, is trapped in her large home by agoraphobia. She has been there for about a year, after a personal trauma. If she tries to go outside, the world spins. She drinks too much, and recklessly combines alcohol and anti-anxiety medication. Police officers distrust her judgment. Online, she plays chess and contributes to a forum for stress-sufferers, a place where danger lies.
This is the setup for “Copycat,” a spirited 1995 thriller, set in San Francisco, starring Sigourney Weaver and Holly Hunter. It also describes “The Woman in the Window.” In “Copycat,” the psychologist’s forum log-in is She Doc. In “Window,” it’s THEDOCTORISIN."
That kind of put me off too. But I'm leaving it up to the board to decide either way
That is true. And copying a movie called Copycat sounds exactly like something he would do.