...are not answering any of the moderator's questions about the glitches in TN (which, by the way, is Cricketville). This lack of response is really a slap in the face, and I know I'm not alone in my mod irritation.
I have a feeling there's a lot of board meetings going on down at Nest HQ.
Post by melodramatic26 on May 11, 2012 8:24:25 GMT -5
Hey flexie, what were you and jennybeeb talkinga about (maybe last night/yesterday)- did you guys get booted from your moderator positions without knowing it or something?
Hey flexie, what were you and jennybeeb talkinga about (maybe last night/yesterday)- did you guys get booted from your moderator positions without knowing it or something?
No, we haven't been. It was some silly troll. The NG's are not up that late at night (EST) anyway.
Hey flexie, what were you and jennybeeb talkinga about (maybe last night/yesterday)- did you guys get booted from your moderator positions without knowing it or something?
No, we haven't been. It was some silly troll. The NG's are not up that late at night (EST) anyway.
you think so? i feel like they probably really don't give a shit.
] to the extent that ad revenue depended on page views, someone has to care a little.
Look at the new pages, though... the main site has ads. The message boards don't, except for 'look at this article on the main page' links. I honestly don't think they give a shit about the message boards at all anymore.
I suspect they're trying to do a cleanse of sorts. They'd love it if the boards were more cutesy-cuddly-wuddly, because it's more in line with their general Cosmo-girl view of things. So no. I think the forums are deliberately crappy. They didn't bother beta-testing the new format, because they could work out the bugs after it went live and in the bargain, get rid of what they view as undesirables.
so going back to ML would actually be sticking it to the man then.
But even if they don't want us, there is no denying that our million clicks a day probably looks good to their advertisers. I'm betting that when their revenue goes down, even if they don't change the message boards, someone's ass is grass. I'm hoping for Bump Kathleen.
I bet the meetings are more of the "How do we get new members" kind rather than the "How do we get our regulars back" kind.
I really agree with this. It's a stupid idea, but they're lack of concern about what we wanted with the change really indicates that they don't give a shit that we've given them so many page views.
I suspect they're trying to do a cleanse of sorts. They'd love it if the boards were more cutesy-cuddly-wuddly, because it's more in line with their general Cosmo-girl view of things. So no. I think the forums are deliberately crappy. They didn't bother beta-testing the new format, because they could work out the bugs after it went live and in the bargain, get rid of what they view as undesirables.
Yeah, they've told me a million times my mod abilities should be working....uh, nope. And to PP, HQ is in NYC, I believe.
I'm getting the same run-around. I've heard it works with Firefox but I'm not freakin' set up with Firefox at work. Does this mean I can't moderate during the day. Jeez.