My IRAs did much better, thankfully. And my 401(k) is only 2 years old, which means that half of the contributions were from 2012 (and spread out across 2012) so dollar cost averaging may have worked against me since January 2012 (for example) was so much stronger than the rest of the year, and almost half of the contributions to my 401(k) ever were after January. And yes, I'm apparently very defensive about this.
Post by mustbeagame on Jan 10, 2013 11:07:08 GMT -5
15.99%
ETA: Also I didn't put any thing in this 401K last year, because I was not working for the company, but I have returned this year. I was very excited about getting my lost vesting returned to me, that little chunk was about 6% of the total value.
Mine was 15.0%!! Yay! I just have it all in a Fidelity Target fund.
Are Target funds the ones where they're automatically re-balanced each year, based on when you're planning to retire? So there's a 2025 one, a 2030 one, etc? Because we're with Fidelity and our choices with those are all doing much lower than the mix I had picked out. Ranging from 5-7.5 percent in 2012. (Maybe their longer-range historical is much better, IDK.)
I have all the books I could need, and what more could I need than books? I shall only engage in commerce if books are the coin. -- Catherynne M. Valente
Either I'm doing my 401k completely wrong or my rate of return is incorrect. Probably the former.
The numbers in these threads are always really high.
We had this same thread last week and someone said 70%. I dont even know how that is possible unless you have all your money in your company stock and the company does amazing.