This part makes me think Boeing needs to take a closer look at this aircraft.
“The airline said the plane was a Boeing 737 Max 8, the same model aircraft involved in the Indonesian Lion Air crash in October in which the plane plunged into the sea shortly after take off.”
There are multiple types of 737s. The Max 8 is the one that is under the microscope here. We fly Southwest next month, which exclusively flies 737s, but only has 13 Max 8s. Looking up our flights now.
There are multiple types of 737s. The Max 8 is the one that is under the microscope here. We fly Southwest next month, which exclusively flies 737s, but only has 13 Max 8s. Looking up our flights now.
I was just reading this and it says SW has 250 on order or in current operation. Actually I think ours might be an 800 and not a Max.
I'm so sad for everyone on the plane and their loved ones.
Obviously Boeing needs to look into safety of this plane, but even so the risk to any one individual flying, even a Max 8, is still tiny in comparison to all of the other risks in our lives. In case that is any reassurance to anyone about to fly.
They need to recall their Max 8s. They may claim if the pilot would have done xyz it would have been fine but obviously something is wrong with their planes where the pilots can’t overcome whatever is happening.
I know I’m flying on one on southwest in May and not happy about it.
Post by underwaterrhymes on Mar 10, 2019 9:36:45 GMT -5
I also want to say that Ethiopian Air is my very favorite airline I’ve ever flown. Everything from the customer service to the food is the best I’ve experienced.
This was a new plane. Delivered to the airline in October or November of last year. Definitely seems like a Boeing issue to me. Those poor people
Ugh. I wasn’t trying to throw other countries/airlines under the bus. I really hope Boeing feels the pressure to figure out what is happening, or if they don’t I really hope other companies will step up to push them aside.
Post by fuckyourcouch on Mar 10, 2019 11:01:33 GMT -5
I think Boeing needs to look at the max line carefully, but I don’t think this is very similar to the Lion Air incident. In that incident, there was a constraint stream of data until the plane crashed, indicating fluctuations in altitude, etc. That is not the case here. I’m not saying it was terorrism either, just that it was suddenly off radar.
My H says the Max 8 has this system that runs in the background that overrides pilots’ actions. If the plane thinks you’re tipped too far up, it automatically tips you down (so on ascent, if the system thinks they were pitched too high, it pitched them downward, causing a crash). I am oversimplifying it, but if this is true, why on earth would Boeing have built it so pilots can’t override??
My H says the Max 8 has this system that runs in the background that overrides pilots’ actions. If the plane thinks you’re tipped too far up, it automatically tips you down (so on ascent, if the system thinks they were pitched too high, it pitched them downward, causing a crash). I am oversimplifying it, but if this is true, why on earth would Boeing have built it so pilots can’t override??
I may have this wrong, but I think a lawsuit was filed against Boeing this week about this. And if I understood correctly there is a way to override it but the pilots haven't always been trained how or something? I was listening to a rundown on the radio this week and obviously don't remember all the details.
I think Boeing needs to look at the max line carefully, but I don’t think this is very similar to the Lion Air incident. In that incident, there was a constraint stream of data until the plane crashed, indicating fluctuations in altitude, etc. That is not the case here. I’m not saying it was terorrism either, just that it was suddenly off radar.
I think it's more likely that this is a similar situation to the Lion Air incident. The pilot requested to return to the airport so he clearly felt something was wrong.
I think Boeing needs to look at the max line carefully, but I don’t think this is very similar to the Lion Air incident. In that incident, there was a constraint stream of data until the plane crashed, indicating fluctuations in altitude, etc. That is not the case here. I’m not saying it was terorrism either, just that it was suddenly off radar.
I think it's more likely that this is a similar situation to the Lion Air incident. The pilot requested to return to the airport so he clearly felt something was wrong.
I didn’t say there wasn’t something wrong. It sounds more likely to be engine trouble to me, considering the irregular speeds recorded, not altitude as with the Lion Air accident.