Home Ip has been banned. Careful guests, that's what happens when certain regulars disagree with you.
Don't worry, I can still get to this board.
Any explanation from the responsible mod or admin would be nice. I know what people think of niceness round here though, so don't be surprised if there is none.
Feel free to start the party amongst your likeminded community members. First round is on me. :drink:
Do you think you are the first annoying poster this board (and all iterations of this board) has had? Someone thinks awfully high of themselves.
This board nor the nest has never just banned someone for being merely annoying and I don't see it starting now. You've either done something to warrant a ban beyond being simply a thorn, you are mistaken, or a mod or someone at proboards is on a power trip.
Wait was there something deleted other than seesaw's two sentence comment about how s/he can't imagine many men turning down a 15 year old who seems willing? That's a viewpoint for us to flame, not something ban-worthy IMO.
Wait was there something deleted other than seesaw's two sentence comment about how s/he can't imagine many men turning down a 15 year old who seems willing? That's a viewpoint for us to flame, not something ban-worthy IMO.
Wait was there something deleted other than seesaw's two sentence comment about how s/he can't imagine many men turning down a 15 year old who seems willing? That's a viewpoint for us to flame, not something ban-worthy IMO.
Wait was there something deleted other than seesaw's two sentence comment about how s/he can't imagine many men turning down a 15 year old who seems willing? That's a viewpoint for us to flame, not something ban-worthy IMO.
I think it was the way this was phrased that prompted the banning.
Wait was there something deleted other than seesaw's two sentence comment about how s/he can't imagine many men turning down a 15 year old who seems willing? That's a viewpoint for us to flame, not something ban-worthy IMO.
A) If you don't see the difference between graphic detail and implying that the child wanted it and saying "the offender touched her on her butt, the end" well...okay then.
B) Your link gave me a pop-up I couldn't get rid of. Thanks for that.
A) So you missed the entire point of my first question, which was asking how his statement was worded. Since it was deleted before most of us (and I) read it I don't know if seesaw was graphic and pervy or the other. B) Turn on your pop up blocker.
Didn't proboards demand we get rid of S&R? So I could see them be hard lined on descriptions of child porn.
But people eating babies is right-a-roo.
This entire train of thought and action disturbs me to no end. And no, I'm not even referencing whatever Seesaw said about dudes pining for under-age action... which is pretty much most of American red-blooded males when the freakin' Olson twins were nearing legal age.
Post by EllieArroway on May 30, 2012 13:53:01 GMT -5
Honestly I am not sure how well offend-offs would go over on proboards. A lot of what's usually posted would probably violate TOU. But basically, we have already been in hot water with them twice and I would prefer not to get shut down because of a troll. It might be different if s/he posted for real anywhere, but this was someone who had several names and all of them were used to troll different boards here. I'm not going to stick my neck out for someone who isn't a community member. She has also already had previous warnings and I have had to delete prior posts of hers that violated the terms.