Honestly I am not sure how well offend-offs would go over on proboards. A lot of what's usually posted would probably violate TOU. But basically, we have already been in hot water with them twice and I would prefer not to get shut down because of a troll. It might be different if s/he posted for real anywhere, but this was someone who had several names and all of them were used to troll different boards here. I'm not going to stick my neck out for someone who isn't a community member. She has also already had previous warnings and I have had to delete prior posts of hers that violated the terms.
This entire train of thought and action disturbs me to no end. And no, I'm not even referencing whatever Seesaw said about dudes pining for under-age action... which is pretty much most of American red-blooded males when the freakin' Olson twins were nearing legal age.
Over the line, IMO.
It's not the GBCN line, it's the proboards line
This seems like it could be solved simply by editing the word p*ssy though. Seesaw wasn't posting child porn, s/he was posting a stupid opinion.
ditto this isnt pixy and other mods doing this shit its proboards
My understanding was there's a process where mods can recommend someone to be banned, and then that is considered by the administrator - Ellie, right? - and then banning may or may not occur. Is that correct?
Okay, so since Seesaw came on the scene, I've been wondering if they could be one of two people. Did Banneddumpsterbaby make it over? Also SIIHPAPP? I just don't think this is a new troll. Could be an old regular turned troll. It's easy to be a troll on ProBoards. No account needed.
Didn't proboards demand we get rid of S&R? So I could see them be hard lined on descriptions of child porn.
But people eating babies is right-a-roo.
This entire train of thought and action disturbs me to no end. And no, I'm not even referencing whatever Seesaw said about dudes pining for under-age action... which is pretty much most of American red-blooded males when the freakin' Olson twins were nearing legal age.
Over the line, IMO.
I didn't see what was said or the context. But just generally, talking about something disturbing w/ respect to a child is not the same thing as talking about something sexually pornographic w/ respect to a child.
Okay, so since Seesaw came on the scene, I've been wondering if they could be one of two people. Did Banneddumpsterbaby make it over? Also SIIHPAPP? I just don't think this is a new troll. Could be an old regular turned troll. It's easy to be a troll on ProBoards. No account needed.
SIIHPAPP used to own his shit, thought, didn't he?
Let's just be honest here. Seesaw was banned because the mods got tired of having to edit its posts.
And to be honest, I don't blame them. Maybe some kind of announcement to the rest of us prior or in conjuction with the banning should have happened but I'm not willing to die on this hill for someone who was warned repeatedly not to violate the TOUs.
Okay, so since Seesaw came on the scene, I've been wondering if they could be one of two people. Did Banneddumpsterbaby make it over? Also SIIHPAPP? I just don't think this is a new troll. Could be an old regular turned troll. It's easy to be a troll on ProBoards. No account needed.
SIIHPAPP used to own his shit, thought, didn't he?
i've thought BDB was involved, too.
Yeah, he did. I just hadn't seen him in a long time. Wondered if he was using ProBoards to make his comeback.
I didn't think what seesaw said was necessarily automatically ban-worthy, but considering that we're already on an edge with ProBoards, I think it makes sense.
Post by EllieArroway on May 30, 2012 14:05:12 GMT -5
Bdb and siihpapp were both a million times better than seesaw at the trolling thing. I never really thought of siihpapp as a troll anyway, and I always assumed bdb was a regs ae.
I didn't think what seesaw said was necessarily automatically ban-worthy, but considering that we're already on an edge with ProBoards, I think it makes sense.
Add the fact that s/he's not registered or behaving as a member of the community, and the multiple troll-y SNs, and I can see this argument. The statement wasn't ban-worthy on its own though, and it certainly wasn't child pornography.
I have repeatedly stated my stance against pedophiles.
I've also asked for guidance from board mods on appropriate behaviors and declared my intent to comply. All I got in response was.advice to keep posts short.
I am not male.
And of course this happens as soon as we start talking about Romney. Damn.
I didn't think what seesaw said was necessarily automatically ban-worthy, but considering that we're already on an edge with ProBoards, I think it makes sense.
Agreed.
I think if this was its first offense, it wouldn't have been banned.
But dude, mods have better things to do than police this asshat's posts.
I have repeatedly stated my stance against pedophiles.
I've also asked for guidance from board mods on appropriate behaviors and declared my intent to comply. All I got in response was.advice to keep posts short.
I am not male.
And of course this happens as soon as we start talking about Romney. Damn.
Everyone else seems to be able to post just fine on these boards without having their hand held and step-by-step explanation.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I think there is a little inconsistency about offensiveness. What she said was gross, but I've seen (and still see) some equally inappropriate gifs and pictures around here, some involving minors.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I think there is a little inconsistency about offensiveness. What she said was gross, but I've seen (and still see) some equally inappropriate gifs and pictures around here, some involving minors.
Pls don't tell me we're back to tefs signature again.
This is hilarious. Feel free to post your crazy shit from work and your phone so we can get those banned, too, mmkay? Something tells me it wont take long.