I hope they both destroy each other and Hakeem Jeffries stomps all over their bloody carcasses. More realistically ( or maybe not?) I hope they both knockoff the shenanigans and let congress get something done. But I really hope they both get humiliated here.
I have a fantasy where the dems vote in favor of keeping McCarthy as speaker so McCarthy becomes the dems bitch and they leverage it to push through everything they want. But in reality I KNOW McCarthy will somehow screw over the dems who saved his speakership. I cannot tell you how many time I have rolled this over in my mind trying to figure out a way to make McCarthy our bitch with no way out. The math never works.
I hope they both destroy each other and Hakeem Jeffries stomps all over their bloody carcasses. More realistically ( or maybe not?) I hope they both knockoff the shenanigans and let congress get something done. But I really hope they both get humiliated here.
Same. However, sadly the ability to feel humiliation requires a capacity for shame that I think a lot of these clowns lack.
To answer TR’s question from the other thread, this could potentially send us all back to the endless speaker race infighting we saw with McCarthy’s initial votes, basically a stalemate between Democrats (all voting for the same Dem speaker candidate) and the two warring factions of the R caucus trying to amass enough votes to rally behind a speaker with some wanting the current speaker and some trying to install someone more conservative. As we saw it can really drag out, so it’s awesome they’re focusing on this and not on the budget and other stuff that is actually important.
To answer TR ’s question from the other thread, this could potentially send us all back to the endless speaker race infighting we saw with McCarthy’s initial votes, basically a stalemate between Democrats (all voting for the same Dem speaker candidate) and the two warring factions of the R caucus trying to amass enough votes to rally behind a speaker with some wanting the current speaker and some trying to install someone more conservative. As we saw it can really drag out, so it’s awesome they’re focusing on this and not on the budget and other stuff that is actually important.
Thank you! And I worry the Dems will be drawn into doing their "go high, for the good of the country" bullshit that the Rs don't give a shit about and vote McCarthy back just so they can't be blamed for the lingering shutdown (when that wouldn't be what's happening, but you know it's how it would get spun).
To answer TR ’s question from the other thread, this could potentially send us all back to the endless speaker race infighting we saw with McCarthy’s initial votes, basically a stalemate between Democrats (all voting for the same Dem speaker candidate) and the two warring factions of the R caucus trying to amass enough votes to rally behind a speaker with some wanting the current speaker and some trying to install someone more conservative. As we saw it can really drag out, so it’s awesome they’re focusing on this and not on the budget and other stuff that is actually important.
Thank you! And I worry the Dems will be drawn into doing their "go high, for the good of the country" bullshit that the Rs don't give a shit about and vote McCarthy back just so they can't be blamed for the lingering shutdown (when that wouldn't be what's happening, but you know it's how it would get spun).
I do know. But I am actually not worried about that particular scenario. The Dem House caucus has been very tightly held so I doubt there will be any rogue actors in their strategic decision-making. One of the times I actually trust Dem leadership.
Thank you! And I worry the Dems will be drawn into doing their "go high, for the good of the country" bullshit that the Rs don't give a shit about and vote McCarthy back just so they can't be blamed for the lingering shutdown (when that wouldn't be what's happening, but you know it's how it would get spun).
I do know. But I am actually not worried about that particular scenario. The Dem House caucus has been very tightly held so I doubt there will be any rogue actors in their strategic decision-making. One of the times I actually trust Dem leadership.
There is a vote coming up shortly to table/kill motion to remove Speaker McCarthy. I'm assuming that is just to see if they want to bring the motion forward but I'm sure someone smarter than me can correct me.
Well who the fuck do they want to elect Speaker if not McCarthy?? You have a continuing resolution re the government shutdown to work on that will expire in 45- days, goddammit.
Well who the fuck do they want to elect Speaker if not McCarthy?? You have a continuing resolution re the government shutdown to work on that will expire in 45- days, goddammit.
IMO, they just want to sow chaos. That’s their only goal. So if the government shuts down, great!
Well who the fuck do they want to elect Speaker if not McCarthy?? You have a continuing resolution re the government shutdown to work on that will expire in 45- days, goddammit.
IMO, they just want to sow chaos. That’s their only goal. So if the government shuts down, great!
I agree, they were willing to shut it down this weekend. They probably see a shutdown as a positive. I am not optimistic about the next 45 days. If the remove McCarthy and there is no Speaker, are they allowed to work on budget stuff while they figure out a speaker? Or does the House basically come to a halt?
I’m confused. We hate McCarthy obviously. Buy Gaetz did all of this because McCarthy wasn’t extreme enough? So they’re going to put up who? Someone more extreme? And if Dems try to make a deal with mod conservatives to put someone up, wouldn’t they just suffer the same fate that McCarthy did?
I wish I had a time machine so I could go forward 20 years from now and see how bad historians laugh at us. (that is if things actually get better but I truly do not know how much worse it could get.)