Shall I assume all commercial airliners in the area are diverting like a Motherfucker?
Yeah, I've read that many airlines (Virgin, Turkish-which I just flew 3 days ago, Lufthansa, etc.) will all reroute to avoid flying over that area. It is not uncommon for planes to fly over war areas (Syria, Afghanistan, Iraz, etc.) though now in light of this it is obvious why they would want to reroute.
Times like these make me thankful I'm not on twitter because I don't think I could stomach graphic pictures...so so sad.
This is a naive question, but what would the benefit be to either side for doing this?
The separatists aren't going to improve public opinion by shooting down passenger flights and I frankly don't understand at all why either the Russian or Ukranian government would think it was a smart move. Unless they can prove that there was a terrorist hijacking this seems like a no win situation for anyone who did it.
It was listed as a shoot down incident on wiki but it is already gone. That seemed a little presumptious.
While I think shooting down a commercial airline is horrible. It has happened a number of times in our history (both by Russia and the Ukraine, neither of which started a war).
This is a naive question, but what would the benefit be to either side for doing this?
The separatists aren't going to improve public opinion by shooting down passenger flights and I frankly don't understand at all why either the Russian or Ukranian government would think it was a smart move. Unless they can prove that there was a terrorist hijacking this seems like a no win situation for anyone who did it.
My guess is that this was a mistake and the people who fired upon the plane thought it was something other than civilian.
ETA: this is also why I think this was the work of separatists.
This is a naive question, but what would the benefit be to either side for doing this?
The separatists aren't going to improve public opinion by shooting down passenger flights and I frankly don't understand at all why either the Russian or Ukranian government would think it was a smart move. Unless they can prove that there was a terrorist hijacking this seems like a no win situation for anyone who did it.
At this point if separatists shot the plane down I would bet my life savings they shot down the wrong plane.
This is a naive question, but what would the benefit be to either side for doing this?
The separatists aren't going to improve public opinion by shooting down passenger flights and I frankly don't understand at all why either the Russian or Ukranian government would think it was a smart move. Unless they can prove that there was a terrorist hijacking this seems like a no win situation for anyone who did it.
My guess is that it was a terrible, terrible mistake, and there was no intention to shoot down a commuter plane.
This is a naive question, but what would the benefit be to either side for doing this?
The separatists aren't going to improve public opinion by shooting down passenger flights and I frankly don't understand at all why either the Russian or Ukranian government would think it was a smart move. Unless they can prove that there was a terrorist hijacking this seems like a no win situation for anyone who did it.
Donetsk commander Strelkov, longtime Russian agent, claimed credit today for shooting plane he thought was Ukrainian pbs.twimg.com/media/Bswg7UGCQAAtv47.jpg
This is a naive question, but what would the benefit be to either side for doing this?
The separatists aren't going to improve public opinion by shooting down passenger flights and I frankly don't understand at all why either the Russian or Ukranian government would think it was a smart move. Unless they can prove that there was a terrorist hijacking this seems like a no win situation for anyone who did it.
My guess is that this was a mistake and the people who fired upon the plane thought it was something other than civilian.
ETA: this is also why I think this was the work of separatists.
a few reports on TV were saying the passenger plane should have been high up - like 30,000 feet and only a fighter jet could have reached that high not a ground missile?
This is a naive question, but what would the benefit be to either side for doing this?
The separatists aren't going to improve public opinion by shooting down passenger flights and I frankly don't understand at all why either the Russian or Ukranian government would think it was a smart move. Unless they can prove that there was a terrorist hijacking this seems like a no win situation for anyone who did it.
Donetsk commander Strelkov, longtime Russian agent, claimed credit today for shooting plane he thought was Ukrainian pbs.twimg.com/media/Bswg7UGCQAAtv47.jpg
This seems to be what CNN is speculating (or Fahreed Zahkarya (or whatever his name is)).
My guess is that this was a mistake and the people who fired upon the plane thought it was something other than civilian.
ETA: this is also why I think this was the work of separatists.
a few reports on TV were saying the passenger plane should have been high up - like 30,000 feet and only a fighter jet could have reached that high not a ground missile?
I read that the type of system that is being alleged can shoot down things flying as high as 70,000 feet.