@ Roe is officially dead

[redheadbaker]

www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/politics/dobbs-mississippi-supreme-court-abortion-roe-wade/index.html
FUCK FUCK FUCK

[TR]

I really don't have any words other than fuck at this point.

[pixy0stix]

Roe deepened division? The thing that the majority of US citizens agree on? Fuck that noise.

[tealblue]

Just got the notice. Wow. Just no words at all.

[seeyalater52]

I feel dead inside. How are we supposed to keep going about our lives like everything is fine. This is not fine.

[wildrice]

I don't even know what to say. I am just really sad and angry.

[spindle92]

Jun 24, 2022 9:21:23 GMT -5 seeyalater52 said:

I feel dead inside. How are we supposed to keep going about our lives like everything is fine. This is not fine.

pave.

I dont "like" your post, but I agree with it 100%.

[curbsideprophet]

Even though I knew it was coming this just makes me so sad and so angry.

[ECB]

McConnell, Trump, and their millions of supporters have ruined this country and put us on a trajectory that I don't know we can turn around. This SCOTUS is going to set us back decades. If they over turned Roe, what else will they now deem they have the right to overturn?

This is heartbreaking.

[twinmomma]

I'm just heartbroken. Even thought it seemed like it was coming, seeing the actual news headline made me just cry. It's real and I don't know what we're supposed to do.

[cherry1111]

Fuck anyone who voted for Trump, third party, or didn’t vote because they couldn’t vote for Hillary.

[underwaterrhymes]

FUCK

[pumpkin]

Jun 24, 2022 9:17:32 GMT -5 TR said:

I really don't have any words other than fuck at this point.

Me too.

I feel so defeated.

[redheadbaker]

Jun 24, 2022 9:21:23 GMT -5 seeyalater52 said:

I feel dead inside. How are we supposed to keep going about our lives like everything is fine. This is not fine.

I really thought I would cry when the decision was announced, but, nothing. "Dead inside" is the perfect description of how i feel. 

[beetea]

But her emails...

[lea]

My anxiety is through the roof living in this country at this moment.

[seeyalater52]

I’d also like to give a special honorable mention fuck you shoutout to our little friend Roberts for his absurd little concurring opinion that leaves him just enough plausible deniability that I truly think he feels his hands are clean. Fuck your legacy, dude.

[mcppalmbeach]

I feel sick and heartbroken. Shocked that I live in a country that supports gun rights over women’s rights. Shocked that federal access to an abortion is no longer guaranteed. Shocked. Fuck, man.

[StrawberryBlondie]

Jun 24, 2022 9:34:47 GMT -5 redheadbaker said:

Jun 24, 2022 9:21:23 GMT -5 seeyalater52 said:

I feel dead inside. How are we supposed to keep going about our lives like everything is fine. This is not fine.

I really thought I would cry when the decision was announced, but, nothing. "Dead inside" is the perfect description of how i feel. 

It came about 10 minutes later for me.

[estrellita]

I can't. What are they going to come for next? Why are religious extremists allowed to make these decisions? This is not a theocracy. The majority of people support choice. What the actual FUCK.

[bcv513]

I’d also like to give a hearty fuck you to Bernie and his bros for refusing to suck it up and endorse Hillary.

[mcppalmbeach]

Jun 24, 2022 9:22:38 GMT -5 curbsideprophet said:

Even though I knew it was coming this just makes me so sad and so angry.

I knew when Trump was in office this was an end game. I saw it coming through each and every move. And I’m still shocked about it all over again.

[cattledogkisses]

Jun 24, 2022 9:28:18 GMT -5 cherry1111 said:

Fuck anyone who voted for Trump, third party, or didn’t vote because they couldn’t vote for Hillary.

And also a hearty fuck you to the people who told me I was being paranoid when Ginsberg died, and that Roe wouldn’t be overturned. 

[breezy8407]

Jun 24, 2022 9:38:09 GMT -5 lea said:

My anxiety is through the roof living in this country at this moment.

Same. Its a never ending reel of bad news. 

I am so upset and heartbroken even though we knew this was coming. 

[redheadbaker]

They pretty much explicitly state that birth control, same-sex relationships and gay marriage are next:

int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf

The Court today declines to disturb substantive due process jurisprudence generally or the doctrine’s application in other, specific contexts. Cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965) (right of married persons to obtain contraceptives)*; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015) (right to same-sex marriage), are not at issue. The Court’s abortion cases are unique, see ante, at 31–32, 66, 71–72, and no party has asked us to decide “whether our entire Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised,” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 813 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). Thus, I agree that “[n]othing in [the Court’s] opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” Ante, at 66.

For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S. ___, ___ (2019) (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated.

[heat40]

The anger in me is unbearable. Everyone that called us hysterical for screaming about this, all those who sat on their high horse because a candidate didn’t fit perfectly into their unicorn box, all those who unapologetically threw so much hate on the one candidate who could avoid this…..I hate them all. I will never ever stop talking about that and never ever stop blaming them.

[msmerymac]

Jun 24, 2022 9:27:48 GMT -5 twinmomma said:

I'm just heartbroken. Even thought it seemed like it was coming, seeing the actual news headline made me just cry. It's real and I don't know what we're supposed to do.

I cried when the leak came out and I cried when I got my news notification today, despite the rumors yesterday that the decision would come out today. 

Knowing doesn't make it any easier when it happens. 

[dancingirl21]

We knew it was coming. It still feels like a punch to the gut.

A gun now has more rights than I do as a woman. We are in very dark times, ladies.

[abs]

I don’t even know what to say.

I knew this was coming yet I’m somehow shocked. Goodbye life as we know it.

Fuck every person that told us we were being paranoid. God I wish we could rewind to 2016 so badly.

[seeyalater52]

Jun 24, 2022 9:42:17 GMT -5 redheadbaker said:

They pretty much explicitly state that birth control, same-sex relationships and gay marriage are next:

int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf

The Court today declines to disturb substantive due process jurisprudence generally or the doctrine’s application in other, specific contexts. Cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965) (right of married persons to obtain contraceptives)*; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015) (right to same-sex marriage), are not at issue. The Court’s abortion cases are unique, see ante, at 31–32, 66, 71–72, and no party has asked us to decide “whether our entire Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised,” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 813 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). Thus, I agree that “[n]othing in [the Court’s] opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” Ante, at 66.

For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S. ___, ___ (2019) (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated.

We knew it was coming but it’s so blatant. The court also essentially ended the tiers of scrutiny with their ruling in Bruen. I’m truly scared about what happens next.